Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/7.0] Disable gen 1 budget accounting fix for segments #76412

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2022

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Sep 29, 2022

Backport of #76365 to release/7.0

/cc @Maoni0 @PeterSolMS

Customer Impact

Given that we expect some customers will see working set or performance regressions with regions, we want to make sure that clrgc.dll using segments performs just like .NET 6.0 did. So this change disables a gen 1 budget tuning change we did in the 7.0 time frame.

Testing

Ran GCPerfSim scenarios on both WKS and SVR, for both regions and segments.

Risk

Risk should be small because we are undoing a change introduced in 7.0. There is no change for regions, only for segments. Also change is minimal and straightforward.

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

…lementation of GC behaves like .NET 6.0 did.
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 29, 2022

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/gc
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

Backport of #76365 to release/7.0

/cc @Maoni0 @PeterSolMS

Customer Impact

Testing

Risk

IMPORTANT: Is this backport for a servicing release? If so and this change touches code that ships in a NuGet package, please make certain that you have added any necessary package authoring and gotten it explicitly reviewed.

Author: github-actions[bot]
Assignees: -
Labels:

area-GC-coreclr

Milestone: -

@PeterSolMS PeterSolMS added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Sep 30, 2022
Copy link
Member

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approve. please get a code review and we can take for consideration in 7 ga.

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Sep 30, 2022
@Maoni0 Maoni0 added the NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) label Sep 30, 2022
@carlossanlop carlossanlop added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed NO-MERGE The PR is not ready for merge yet (see discussion for detailed reasons) Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Sep 30, 2022
@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

Approved by Tactics via email. Signed off. CI is green. This is fully baked and ready to merge. :shipit:

@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit 15b4005 into release/7.0 Sep 30, 2022
@carlossanlop carlossanlop deleted the backport/pr-76365-to-release/7.0 branch September 30, 2022 21:33
@jeffschwMSFT
Copy link
Member

@carlossanlop the 'no-merge' as on this one as we were still discussing. @Maoni0 with your signoff is it all good?

@Maoni0
Copy link
Member

Maoni0 commented Sep 30, 2022

all good, thanks!

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 31, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-GC-coreclr Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants