-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 971
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add code coverage for RichTextBox #10921
Add code coverage for RichTextBox #10921
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #10921 +/- ##
===================================================
+ Coverage 73.16850% 73.18126% +0.01276%
===================================================
Files 3090 3090
Lines 633647 633665 +18
Branches 47398 47398
===================================================
+ Hits 463630 463724 +94
+ Misses 166460 166395 -65
+ Partials 3557 3546 -11
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
This reverts commit 4af31b5.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Is this one of the existing automation tests from the MadDog days?
src/System.Windows.Forms/tests/UnitTests/System/Windows/Forms/RichTextBoxTests.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/System.Windows.Forms/tests/UnitTests/System/Windows/Forms/RichTextBoxTests.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Yes, this is one of the existing automation tests from the MadDog. |
…RichTextBoxTests.cs Co-authored-by: Tanya Solyanik <tanyaso@microsoft.com>
…RichTextBoxTests.cs Co-authored-by: Tanya Solyanik <tanyaso@microsoft.com>
* Add unit test for RichTextBox control Co-authored-by: Tanya Solyanik <tanyaso@microsoft.com>
related #10453
Proposed changes
Customer Impact
Regression?
Risk
Test methodology
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow