You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now very little reuse of cohorts and labels are possible because their tables are namespaced by their experiment hash. If we namespaced by their name+query hash, we could reuse them much more.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
- Change cohort and label names to include their respective name and
query hash
- Back-update algorithm doc to refer to cohort table instead of old
state table
- Modify algorithm and running docs to reflect the cohort/label table
changes
- Add validation that enforces cohort and label names are table-safe
- Change cohort and label names to include their respective name and
query hash
- Back-update algorithm doc to refer to cohort table instead of old
state table
- Modify algorithm and running docs to reflect the cohort/label table
changes
- Add validation that enforces cohort and label names are table-safe
- Change cohort and label names to include their respective name and
query hash
- Back-update algorithm doc to refer to cohort table instead of old
state table
- Modify algorithm and running docs to reflect the cohort/label table
changes
- Add validation that enforces cohort and label names are table-safe,
introducing the hypothesis library to perform hypothesis testing of this
function
Right now very little reuse of cohorts and labels are possible because their tables are namespaced by their experiment hash. If we namespaced by their name+query hash, we could reuse them much more.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: