feat(invitation): allow access to invitation endpoint to technical user

[typecastcloud]

Description

Allow access to invitation endpoint to technical user.

Why

Technical user/clients were not able to use endpoint.

Issue

Refs: #932

Checklist

• I have followed the contributing guidelines
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have successfully tested my changes locally
• I have checked that new and existing tests pass locally with my changes

[Phil91]

@typecastcloud please update the dependencies. can be found in the artefacts here: https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/portal-backend/actions/runs/10402110437?pr=933

[typecastcloud]

@typecastcloud please update the dependencies. can be found in the artefacts here: https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/portal-backend/actions/runs/10402110437?pr=933

Hi @Phil91, I rebased to release/v2.2.0-RC4 branch. Tests are failing on that branch. Not sure if that also resolved dependencies.

[evegufy]

Hi @typecastcloud I suggest to do an interactive rebase dropping all commits that aren't yours

[typecastcloud]

Hi @typecastcloud I suggest to do an interactive rebase dropping all commits that aren't yours

Done. Rebased on RC5. Not sure why this PR wants updated dependencies.

[typecastcloud]

@evegufy I also updated dependencies now

I didn't notice that this was considered for 2.2.0.

[Phil91]

@MaximilianHauer should this be included in the 2.2.0 release?

[evegufy]

@evegufy I also updated dependencies now

I didn't notice that this was considered for 2.2.0.

@typecastcloud I didn't question the base branch up to now but yes, I'd prefer to move it to main, not to 2.2.0.

cc: @Phil91 @MaximilianHauer

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[evegufy]

@MaximilianHauer could you please review as well?

[evegufy]

@MaximilianHauer could you please review as well?

Just saw #932 (comment)

[typecastcloud]

@MaximilianHauer could you please review as well?

Just saw #932 (comment)

I'll create a separate PR for this since it requires more complex additions to the code base.