Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[7.14](backport #26617) [CI] fight the flakiness with some retry option in the CI only for the Pull Requests #26646

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jul 1, 2021

This is an automatic backport of pull request #26617 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.io/

@mergify mergify bot added the backport label Jul 1, 2021
@mergify mergify bot assigned v1v Jul 1, 2021
@v1v v1v changed the title [CI] fight the flakiness with some retry option in the CI only for the Pull Requests (backport #26617) [7.14](backport #26617) [CI] fight the flakiness with some retry option in the CI only for the Pull Requests Jul 1, 2021
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Jul 1, 2021
@v1v v1v added the Team:Automation Label for the Observability productivity team label Jul 1, 2021
@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Jul 1, 2021
@v1v
Copy link
Member

v1v commented Jul 1, 2021

For instance,

This particular PR for the build 1 failed:

image

And when all the pending stages finished, then the pr-merge still continues

image

image

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

elasticmachine commented Jul 1, 2021

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Build Cause: v1v commented: /test

  • Start Time: 2021-07-01T15:40:00.388+0000

  • Duration: 52 min 5 sec

  • Commit: 688b40d

Trends 🧪

Image of Build Times

Test errors 0

Expand to view the tests failures

Extended / metricbeat-windows-2012-windows-2012-r2 / TestPdhSuccessfulCounterRetrieval – github.com/elastic/beats/v7/metricbeat/helper/windows/pdh
    Expand to view the error details

     Failed 
    

    Expand to view the stacktrace

     === RUN   TestPdhSuccessfulCounterRetrieval
        pdh_windows_test.go:125: 
            	Error Trace:	pdh_windows_test.go:125
            	Error:      	Expected nil, but got: 0x800007d6
            	Test:       	TestPdhSuccessfulCounterRetrieval
        pdh_windows_test.go:126: 
            	Error Trace:	pdh_windows_test.go:126
            	Error:      	Should not be zero, but was 0
            	Test:       	TestPdhSuccessfulCounterRetrieval
    --- FAIL: TestPdhSuccessfulCounterRetrieval (0.00s)
     
    

❕ Flaky test report

No test was executed to be analysed.

@v1v
Copy link
Member

v1v commented Jul 1, 2021

/test

@v1v
Copy link
Member

v1v commented Jul 5, 2021

Unfortunately, there are a couple of issues:

  1. Test population with the retry does not reset the test failures
  2. Dynamic stage does not reset the overall build status

@v1v v1v closed this Jul 5, 2021
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/7.14/pr-26617 branch July 5, 2021 08:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Team:Automation Label for the Observability productivity team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants