Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Derive Clone on Bulk request structs #202

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jefftt
Copy link
Contributor

@jefftt jefftt commented May 9, 2022

Addresses #195

This option is the least invasive as it doesn't change the type signatures although it requires extra allocations in order to clone the struct. Allowing body to take a reference to a slice of operations instead of ownership would be a more efficient solution that could be addressed in a separate PR

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Since this is a community submitted pull request, a Jenkins build has not been kicked off automatically. Can an Elastic organization member please verify the contents of this patch and then kick off a build manually?

@cla-checker-service
Copy link

cla-checker-service bot commented May 9, 2022

💚 CLA has been signed

@jefftt
Copy link
Contributor Author

jefftt commented May 10, 2022

i signed the CLA but not sure github is being updated properly

@jefftt
Copy link
Contributor Author

jefftt commented May 10, 2022

oh there we go

@jefftt
Copy link
Contributor Author

jefftt commented Mar 10, 2023

Hi @russcam - any interest in this change?

@russcam
Copy link
Contributor

russcam commented Mar 24, 2023

Hey @jefftt, I no longer work for Elastic so no longer have access rights to this repository to work with you on this PR. Perhaps @swallez or @sethmlarson can work with you to get this in?

Copy link
Member

@swallez swallez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the long delay, the project has been dormant for a while.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants