Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support node tools for Lucene-based cluster storage #50070

Closed

Conversation

ywelsch
Copy link
Contributor

@ywelsch ywelsch commented Dec 11, 2019

This PR adapts the node tools to work with the new Lucene-based cluster state storage mechanism. It also switches all node types to make use of this new storage mechanism (which simplifies the tooling), and reenables BWC on this development branch. It fixes dangling indices in a quick way that allows passing all the existing tests. There are more TODOs to be done there, however. Data-only nodes now also write the cluster state in the same way as master-eligible nodes. In a future PR, cluster state storage on data-only nodes will be made async.

@ywelsch ywelsch added >enhancement :Distributed/Cluster Coordination Cluster formation and cluster state publication, including cluster membership and fault detection. labels Dec 11, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed (:Distributed/Cluster Coordination)

@ywelsch ywelsch marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2019 14:59
@ywelsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

ywelsch commented Dec 11, 2019

@elasticmachine run elasticsearch-ci/packaging-sample-matrix

@ywelsch
Copy link
Contributor Author

ywelsch commented Dec 13, 2019

Closed in favor of #50179

@ywelsch ywelsch closed this Dec 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Distributed/Cluster Coordination Cluster formation and cluster state publication, including cluster membership and fault detection. >enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants