[CI] Drop duplicate lint check #158259
Merged
[CI] Drop duplicate lint check #158259
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
wayneseymour
added
release_note:skip
💚 Build Succeeded
Metrics [docs]Unknown metric groupsESLint disabled line counts
Total ESLint disabled count
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: |
mistic
approved these changes
May 23, 2023
kibanamachine
added
v8.9.0
backport:skip
delanni
pushed a commit
to delanni/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2023
## Summary Noticed a duplicate lint check in a [pr](https://buildkite.com/elastic/kibana-pull-request/builds/129550#01884877-20a5-4b7d-a395-9bd70bac3f75) I was working on. Considering what this check does, we prolly really do not want to run it twice, unless this was not a mistake.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Noticed a duplicate lint check in a pr I was working on.
Considering what this check does, we prolly really do not want to run it twice, unless this was not a mistake.