Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[7.x] [Security] Adds field mapping support to rule creation (#70288) #70603

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 2, 2020

Conversation

FrankHassanabad
Copy link
Contributor

Backports the following commits to 7.x:

## Summary

Resolves: elastic#65941, elastic#66317, and `Add support for "building block" alerts`

This PR is `Part I` and adds additional fields to the `rules schema` in supporting the ability to map and override fields when generating alerts. A few bookkeeping fields like `license` and `author` have been added as well. The new fields are as follows:

``` ts
export interface TheseAreTheNewFields {
  author: string[];
  building_block_type: string; // 'default'
  license: string;
  risk_score_mapping: Array<
    {
      field: string;
      operator: string; // 'equals'
      value: string;
    }
  >;
  rule_name_override: string;
  severity_mapping: Array<
    {
      field: string;
      operator: string; // 'equals'
      value: string;
      severity: string; // 'low' | 'medium' | 'high' | 'critical'
    }
  >;
  timestamp_override: string;
}
```

These new fields are exposed as additional settings on the `About rule` section of the Rule Creation UI.

##### Default collapsed view, no severity or risk score override specified:
<p align="center">
  <img width="500" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2946766/86090417-49c0ee80-ba67-11ea-898f-a43af6d9383f.png" />
</p>

##### Severity & risk score override specified:
<p align="center">
  <img width="500" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2946766/86091165-a8d33300-ba68-11ea-86ac-89393a7ca3f5.png" />
</p>

##### Additional fields in Advanced settings:
<p align="center">
  <img width="500" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2946766/86091256-cbfde280-ba68-11ea-9b63-acf2524039bd.png" />
</p>


Note: This PR adds the fields to the `Rules Schema`, the `signals index mapping`,  and creates the UI for adding these fields during Rule Creation/Editing. The follow-up `Part II` will add the business logic for mapping fields during `rule execution`, and also add UI validation/additional tests.

### Checklist

Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.

- [x] Any text added follows [EUI's writing guidelines](https://elastic.github.io/eui/#/guidelines/writing), uses sentence case text and includes [i18n support](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/master/packages/kbn-i18n/README.md)
- [ ] [Documentation](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#writing-documentation) was added for features that require explanation or tutorials
  - Syncing w/ @benskelker 
- [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#cross-browser-compatibility) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
- [x] This was checked for [keyboard-only and screenreader accessibility](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/Tools_and_testing/Cross_browser_testing/Accessibility#Accessibility_testing_checklist)

### For maintainers

- [x] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled appropriately](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#release-notes-process)
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Build metrics

@kbn/optimizer bundle module count

id value diff baseline
securitySolution 790 +6 784

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad merged commit 00eed1b into elastic:7.x Jul 2, 2020
@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad deleted the backport/7.x/pr-70288 branch July 2, 2020 16:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants