Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[7.9] changes for upgrade assistant functional test to incorporate test user (#70071) #73145

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 4, 2020

Conversation

rashmivkulkarni
Copy link
Contributor

Backports the following commits to 7.9:

elastic#70071)

* changes for upgrade assistant functional test to incorporate test user

* changes to toggle on/off

* upgrade_assistant role

* upgrade assistant

* more debug statements to check on cloud

* commented the sleeps to check toggle button

* reduced the sleep to 2 seconds to test on cloud

Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <elasticmachine@users.noreply.github.com>
@rashmivkulkarni
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine merge upstream

@rashmivkulkarni
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine merge upstream

@rashmivkulkarni
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine merge upstream

@rashmivkulkarni
Copy link
Contributor Author

@legrego/ @jportner - can u help me please figure out what changed btw master and 7.9 - same role is passing on master - ref PR (#70071)

@rashmivkulkarni
Copy link
Contributor Author

when ran locally logs say ERROR browser[SEVERE] http://localhost:5620/api/upgrade_assistant/status - Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 (Forbidden) │ debg expectDeprecationLoggingLabel()
Screenshot captured:
Screen Shot 2020-07-31 at 8 46 12 AM

Co-authored-by: Joe Portner <5295965+jportner@users.noreply.github.com>
@rashmivkulkarni
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine merge upstream

@rashmivkulkarni
Copy link
Contributor Author

@alisonelizabeth

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Build metrics

✅ unchanged

History

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

Copy link
Contributor

@alisonelizabeth alisonelizabeth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Backport LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants