Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade @elastic/apm-rum to 5.6.0 #78345

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2020
Merged

Conversation

joshdover
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Explicitly bumps @elastic/apm-rum package to 5.6.0

@joshdover joshdover added Team:Core Core services & architecture: plugins, logging, config, saved objects, http, ES client, i18n, etc Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team v8.0.0 release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes v7.10.0 labels Sep 23, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-platform (Team:Platform)

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-operations (Team:Operations)

Copy link
Member

@vigneshshanmugam vigneshshanmugam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good 👍

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Build metrics

page load bundle size

id value diff baseline
core 1.2MB +62.0B 1.2MB

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

@joshdover joshdover merged commit 67c0ac7 into elastic:master Sep 24, 2020
@joshdover joshdover deleted the upgrade-apm-rum branch September 24, 2020 17:25
joshdover added a commit to joshdover/kibana that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Core Core services & architecture: plugins, logging, config, saved objects, http, ES client, i18n, etc Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team v7.10.0 v8.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants