vm/tests: add support for test networks with activated EIPs

[jochem-brouwer]

This PR adds support for ethereum/tests forks where there are added EIPs; these are usually experimental and it is not clear if they will ever be in an actual fork, but they have tests anyways.

To test;

cd packages/ethereum-tests
git checkout push0
npm run test:blockchain -- --fork=London+3855

Results in 12 passing tests, so looks like we pass the (draft) tests for EIP3855 as well 😄

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1617 (0dbe980) into master (b224247) will decrease coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Flag	Coverage Δ
block	85.01% <ø> (ø)
blockchain	83.28% <ø> (ø)
client	71.22% <ø> (+0.09%)	⬆️
common	93.89% <ø> (ø)
devp2p	82.50% <ø> (ø)
ethash	90.76% <ø> (ø)
rlp	?
trie	86.18% <ø> (ø)
tx	89.94% <ø> (ø)
util	92.62% <ø> (ø)
vm	81.27% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[ryanio]

There are a few leftover console.logs

[jochem-brouwer]

Don't know why I did not notice that when linting 🤔 Removed them.

[ryanio]

Thanks! I believe we have the no-console rule overridden to be ignored in tester.ts since we log some other important output. You can see that in packages/vm/.eslintrc.js

[acolytec3]

I made one change to use common.custom instead of the deprecated common.forCustomChain but looks great otherwise! I tested with a couple of different hardfork combinations and it parsed them all correctly (and threw an error if trying to set an unsupported hardfork - as expected).

[holgerd77]

Can we also add 1-2 lines on how to use this in the developer README somewhere here?

Also ok of course to somewhat restructure along if the current structure of the section is generally not so optimal or something.

[holgerd77]

Can this be updated at some point?

[jochem-brouwer]

I will update this before the end of this month.

[jochem-brouwer]

Updated docs, thanks for the reviews 😄

[holgerd77]

LGTM