-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inadequate geological map from gp.plot_2d(geo_model, section_names = ["topography"]) #688
Comments
mkondratyev85
added a commit
to mkondratyev85/gempy
that referenced
this issue
Apr 6, 2022
mkondratyev85
added a commit
to mkondratyev85/gempy
that referenced
this issue
Apr 6, 2022
Fix issue gempy-project#688
6 tasks
mkondratyev85
changed the title
Inadequate geological from map gp.plot_2d(geo_model, section_names = ["topography"])
Inadequate geological map from gp.plot_2d(geo_model, section_names = ["topography"])
Apr 6, 2022
Thanks for noticing and implementing a change @mkondratyev85 👍 |
Japhiolite
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 29, 2022
Fixes issue #688 with slightly inadequate geological map as a result of plot_2d()
PR is merged. Thanks again @mkondratyev85 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
If you add topography to geo_model in gempy then you can generate nicely looking geological map by using gempy function
plot_2d
.This process is described in details in the gempy manual:
https://docs.gempy.org/tutorials/ch1_fundamentals/ch1_3b_cross_sections.html#sphx-glr-tutorials-ch1-fundamentals-ch1-3b-cross-sections-py
However, there is s a subtle error in the process of constructing of the resulting map. This error is so subtle it's even made its way into the manual mentioned above.
Section 1 looks nice.
But If you look closer on section 2 on the resulting map from the manual you'll see that geology that is presented on the section differs from the geology under the trace of section 2 on the map. The same issue with section 3.
The problem here lies not in the section but in how this geological map is compiled. It's relief is drawn correctly. It's data points are placed on the correct positions. But the lithology and contacts are flipped along diagonal axis. That's why section1 looks correct.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: