-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BP only template - issue with Table View #61
Comments
I just tried this using the acts upstream of or within relation, and I see an annotation to the root MF node with the evidence for the BP annotation, but no BP term listed. See the top line here with the annotation to fat-5: I would also expect to see a line with the acts upstream of or within relation in the Relation (to MF) field and then the GO BP term with the same evidence. @krchristie - is this consistent with what you are seeing? |
@vanaukenk - yes, I am seeing the same behavior. Apologies that the model url I pasted in went to the wrong model. I didn't have time to do screenshots, so I thought the link would be sufficient... I had used the 'START NEW MODEL' button and it looks like the url does not update to that of the new model. I have edited the original comment to go to the correct model now. |
@krchristie @vanaukenk can you check this plus its error message |
Thanks, @tmushayahama . |
It looks like @tmushayahama has already responded to the previous comment by @vanaukenk to show the relationship between the MF and the BP, because I now see this: which is consistent with the graph: So, I think the SAE Table View now looks great, and matches the Graph. However:
|
Remove 'MF part of' text from the Biological Process line so as not to confuse the statement being made. |
First on this issue, I will fix the second occurs_in and should be part of, correct? @krchristie so this is about where the dropdown of the connections is located? Noctua 2.0 will address this issue. But where exactly can I put it? Is it possible to ask a question before the dropdown. like Relationship to Anonymous MF? [____v] |
@tmushayahama Wrt the MF - BP relations, I think what @krchristie is saying is that in the BP only version of the form it makes more sense to her to show root MF (molecular_function) and then display the MF - BP relations in the dropdown rather than the gene product-to-BP relations. That display would then more accurately depict what is actually happening behind the scenes wrt creating the GO-CAM model, since the BP only form automatically generates an annotation to root MF. We can discuss tomorrow how best to address this going forward. |
@balhoff - we need to be clear on how to do the pass through from, say, an MF directly to an Anatomical Entity. |
For BP only in form2.0: With respect to, the relations between root MF and BP on the BP only form, change to 'causally upstream of or within' and children. Also, show default annotation to root MF. |
When I enter a BP annotation via the BP only template, the BP term does not show up in the Table View, see: http://68.181.125.145:8910/workbench/simple-annoton-editor/?model_id=gomodel:5ac3d47600001521
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: