Search: Do not change route path when clearing fuzzy search

[tkohr]

Description

Currently, the router navigates to the search when the fuzzy search entry is cleared (with the input's cross) on a different tab/page than the search. This PR intends to maintain the same path when clearing the search. The fuzzy-search.component now only calls updateFilters if searchFilters.any is not empty or undefined.

Also updates @geospatial-sdk/geocoding for the npm package and attempts to fix a flaky e2e test.

Quality Assurance Checklist

• Commit history is devoid of any merge commits and readable to facilitate reviews
• If new logic ⚙️ is introduced: unit tests were added
• If new user stories 🤏 are introduced: E2E tests were added
• If new UI components 🕹️ are introduced: corresponding stories in Storybook were created
• If breaking changes 🪚 are introduced: add the breaking change label
• If bugs 🐞 are fixed: add the backport <release branch> label
• The documentation website 📚 has received the love it deserves

This work is sponsored by MEL.

[github-actions]

Affected libs: feature-search, feature-router, feature-map, feature-dataviz, feature-record,
Affected apps: metadata-editor, datahub, demo, webcomponents, search, map-viewer,

• 🚀 Build and deploy storybook and demo on GitHub Pages
• 📦 Build and push affected docker images

[coveralls]

coverage: 86.281% (+2.8%) from 83.444%
when pulling d94ca4a on fuzzy-search-clear
into 5b8d393 on main.

[jahow]

Thanks for all the added tests! I did a suggestion to make the code more straightforward, what do you think?

[jahow]

Instead of storing an internal state here you can do something like so:

async handleInputCleared() {
  const currentSearchFilters = await firstValueFrom(this.searchFacade.searchFilters$);
  if (!currentSearchFilters.any) { return; }
  this.searchService.updateFilters({ any: '' })
}

[tkohr]

Nice idea, also works as expected, thanks! I just inverted the if to save another line.

[Angi-Kinas]

Thanks @tkohr for changing the behavior for clearing the search input! It looks good to me 👍

[tkohr]

Thanks for the reviews! Unfortunately, the e2e test I tried to improve still does not pass systematically and needed a re-run.