Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve geokey parsing #79

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 3, 2020
Merged

improve geokey parsing #79

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 3, 2020

Conversation

geospatial-jeff
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (tags@6f05fb8). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             tags      #79   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   92.13%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       13           
  Lines           ?     1208           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1113           
  Misses          ?       95           
  Partials        ?        0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6f05fb8...9660f5e. Read the comment docs.

@geospatial-jeff geospatial-jeff merged commit bbed138 into tags Oct 3, 2020
@geospatial-jeff geospatial-jeff deleted the geokey-parsing branch October 3, 2020 19:41
geospatial-jeff added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2020
* support GDAL_METADATA private tag

* update setup.py

* oops

* read more tiff tags included in gdal metadata

* improve geokey parsing (#79)

* improve GeoKeyDirectory parsing

* update test case

* update iter

* support AREA_OR_POINT tag
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants