-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New relation type for masculine/feminine form #883
Comments
I have created a working list of potential matches (based on Wiktionary) here: https://github.com/globalwordnet/english-wordnet/blob/issue-883-working/female-words.csv As these words are sometimes even in the same synset, I will implement this as a sense-level matching |
Hi,
I was thinking we should make the distinction between concepts, where the
words don't necessarily match, which should be at the synset level (e.g.
King <-> Queen) and those where there is a morphological link (like Prince
<-> Princess, Actor <-> Actress). Of course, in many or most cases, there
could be both.
Can you give an example of male and female forms in the same synset? For
consistency, it might be better to try to split them out, ...
…On Mon, 29 May 2023 at 18:18, John McCrae ***@***.***> wrote:
I have created a working list of potential matches (based on Wiktionary
<https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Category:en:Female_people&pagefrom=PROTECTRESS%0Aprotectress#mw-pages>)
here:
https://github.com/globalwordnet/english-wordnet/blob/issue-883-working/female-words.csv
As these words are sometimes even in the same synset, I will implement
this as a sense-level matching
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#883 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIPZRRHEHT3OWQQTQJ65VLXIRZWTANCNFSM56ZXU5AA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
--
Francis Bond <https://fcbond.github.io/>
|
Here is a proposed list of changes Link to gender-neutral entriesIn all cases these synsets are already linked by a hypernym link
In some cases the 'gender-neutral' term is perhaps not so neutral, it should be considered if we want to introduce specifically male synsets for these terms. Note there are hypernym links here so this represents an existing error in OEWN
Link to form in same synsetWe should probably introduce a specifically female and male synset for these:
Other link (including to masculine entry)
This case also probably needs two more specific senses for 'viscountess'
Novel masculine terms to be introducedThese terms all have obvious masculine forms that are not currently in OEWN, we should probably introduce these:
These are probably not worth introducing and the feminine member can also be removed
|
For the small number of English words with feminine forms (e.g., 'actress', 'waitress') we should be able to link them to the corresponding masculine form. In the 2021 release 'hero' was linked to 'heroine' was linked by the 'other' relation but this breaks things and is not consistent (the change below removes these links).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: