Merge branch 'master' into fix-gcc-misleading-indentation-warning

.gitignore

@@ -8,3 +8,5 @@ bazel-genfiles
 bazel-googletest
 bazel-out
 bazel-testlogs
+# python
+*.pyc

.travis.yml

@@ -7,7 +7,11 @@ install:
 # /usr/bin/gcc is 4.6 always, but gcc-X.Y is available.
 - if [ "$CXX" = "g++" ]; then export CXX="g++-4.9" CC="gcc-4.9"; fi
 # /usr/bin/clang is 3.4, lets override with modern one.
-- if [ "$CXX" = "clang++" ] && [ "$TRAVIS_OS_NAME" = "linux" ]; then export CXX="clang++-3.7" CC="clang-3.7"; fi
+- if [ "$CXX" = "clang++" ] && [ "$TRAVIS_OS_NAME" = "linux" ]; then export CXX="clang++-3.7" CC="clang-3.7"; ln -sf /usr/bin/ccache /$HOME/bin/$CXX; ln -sf /usr/bin/ccache /$HOME/bin/$CC; fi
+# ccache on OS X needs installation first
+- if [ "$TRAVIS_OS_NAME" = "osx" ]; then brew install ccache; export PATH="/usr/local/opt/ccache/libexec:$PATH"; fi
+# reset ccache statistics
+- ccache --zero-stats
 - echo ${PATH}
 - echo ${CXX}
 - ${CXX} --version
@@ -22,22 +26,24 @@ addons:
     - ubuntu-toolchain-r-test
     - llvm-toolchain-precise-3.7
     packages:
-    - gcc-4.9
     - g++-4.9
     - clang-3.7
-    - valgrind
 os:
   - linux
   - osx
 language: cpp
+cache: ccache
+before_cache:
+  # print statistics before uploading new cache
+  - ccache --show-stats
 compiler:
   - gcc
   - clang
 script: ./travis.sh
 env:
   matrix:
-    - SHARED_LIB=OFF STATIC_LIB=ON CMAKE_PKG=OFF BUILD_TYPE=debug VERBOSE=1
-    - SHARED_LIB=OFF STATIC_LIB=ON CMAKE_PKG=OFF BUILD_TYPE=debug VERBOSE=1 CXX_FLAGS=-std=c++11
+    - BUILD_TYPE=Debug VERBOSE=1
+    - BUILD_TYPE=Release VERBOSE=1 CXX_FLAGS=-std=c++11
 notifications:
   email: false
 sudo: false

appveyor.yml

@@ -4,68 +4,85 @@ os: Visual Studio 2015
 
 environment:
   matrix:
-  - Toolset: v140
-  - Toolset: v120
-  - Toolset: v110
-  - Toolset: v100
+    - compiler: msvc-14-seh
+      generator: "Visual Studio 14 2015"
 
-platform:
-  - Win32
-  - x64
+    - compiler: msvc-14-seh
+      generator: "Visual Studio 14 2015 Win64"
+
+    - compiler: msvc-12-seh
+      generator: "Visual Studio 12 2013"
+
+    - compiler: msvc-12-seh
+      generator: "Visual Studio 12 2013 Win64"
+
+    - compiler: msvc-11-seh
+      generator: "Visual Studio 11 2012"
+
+    - compiler: msvc-11-seh
+      generator: "Visual Studio 11 2012 Win64"
+
+    - compiler: msvc-10-seh
+      generator: "Visual Studio 10 2010"
+
+    - compiler: gcc-5.3.0-posix
+      generator: "MinGW Makefiles"
+      cxx_path: 'C:\mingw-w64\i686-5.3.0-posix-dwarf-rt_v4-rev0\mingw32\bin'
+
+    - compiler: gcc-6.3.0-posix
+      generator: "MinGW Makefiles"
+      cxx_path: 'C:\mingw-w64\i686-6.3.0-posix-dwarf-rt_v5-rev1\mingw32\bin'
 
 configuration:
-#  - Release
   - Debug
+  #- Release
 
 build:
   verbosity: minimal
 
-artifacts:
-  - path: '_build/Testing/Temporary/*'
-    name: test_results
-
-before_build:
+install:
 - ps: |
-    Write-Output "Configuration: $env:CONFIGURATION"
-    Write-Output "Platform: $env:PLATFORM"
-    $generator = switch ($env:TOOLSET)
-    {
-        "v140" {"Visual Studio 14 2015"}
-        "v120" {"Visual Studio 12 2013"}
-        "v110" {"Visual Studio 11 2012"}
-        "v100" {"Visual Studio 10 2010"}
-    }
-    if ($env:PLATFORM -eq "x64")
-    {
-        $generator = "$generator Win64"
+    Write-Output "Compiler: $env:compiler"
+    Write-Output "Generator: $env:generator"
+
+    # git bash conflicts with MinGW makefiles
+    if ($env:generator -eq "MinGW Makefiles") {
+        $env:path = $env:path.replace("C:\Program Files\Git\usr\bin;", "")
+        if ($env:cxx_path -ne "") {
+            $env:path += ";$env:cxx_path"
+        }
     }
 
 build_script:
 - ps: |
-    if (($env:TOOLSET -eq "v100") -and ($env:PLATFORM -eq "x64"))
-    {
-        return
-    }
     md _build -Force | Out-Null
     cd _build
 
-    & cmake -G "$generator" -DCMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES="Debug;Release" -Dgtest_build_tests=ON -Dgtest_build_samples=ON -Dgmock_build_tests=ON ..
+    $conf = if ($env:generator -eq "MinGW Makefiles") {"-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=$env:configuration"} else {"-DCMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES=Debug;Release"}
+    # Disable test for MinGW (gtest tests fail, gmock tests can not build)
+    $gtest_build_tests = if ($env:generator -eq "MinGW Makefiles") {"-Dgtest_build_tests=OFF"} else {"-Dgtest_build_tests=ON"}
+    $gmock_build_tests = if ($env:generator -eq "MinGW Makefiles") {"-Dgmock_build_tests=OFF"} else {"-Dgmock_build_tests=ON"}
+    & cmake -G "$env:generator" $conf -Dgtest_build_samples=ON $gtest_build_tests $gmock_build_tests ..
     if ($LastExitCode -ne 0) {
         throw "Exec: $ErrorMessage"
     }
-    & cmake --build . --config $env:CONFIGURATION
+    & cmake --build . --config $env:configuration
     if ($LastExitCode -ne 0) {
         throw "Exec: $ErrorMessage"
     }
 
 test_script:
 - ps: |
-    if (($env:Toolset -eq "v100") -and ($env:PLATFORM -eq "x64"))
-    {
-        return
+    if ($env:generator -eq "MinGW Makefiles") {
+        return # No test available for MinGW
     }
-
-    & ctest -C $env:CONFIGURATION --output-on-failure
+    & ctest -C $env:configuration --timeout 300 --output-on-failure
     if ($LastExitCode -ne 0) {
         throw "Exec: $ErrorMessage"
     }
+
+artifacts:
+  - path: '_build/CMakeFiles/*.log'
+    name: logs
+  - path: '_build/Testing/**/*.xml'
+    name: test_results

googlemock/CMakeLists.txt

@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ if (gmock_build_tests)
   cxx_test(gmock_link_test gmock_main test/gmock_link2_test.cc)
   cxx_test(gmock_test gmock_main)
 
-  if (CMAKE_USE_PTHREADS_INIT)
+  if (DEFINED GTEST_HAS_PTHREAD)
     cxx_test(gmock_stress_test gmock)
   endif()
 

googlemock/README.md

@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ posting a question on the
 
 Google Mock is not a testing framework itself.  Instead, it needs a
 testing framework for writing tests.  Google Mock works seamlessly
-with [Google Test](http://code.google.com/p/googletest/), but
+with [Google Test](https://github.com/google/googletest), but
 you can also use it with [any C++ testing framework](../../master/googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md#using-google-mock-with-any-testing-framework).
 
 ### Requirements for End Users ###
@@ -333,8 +333,8 @@ may need to tweak your compiler and/or linker flags.  Please see the
 If you have custom matchers defined using `MatcherInterface` or
 `MakePolymorphicMatcher()`, you'll need to update their definitions to
 use the new matcher API (
-[monomorphic](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook#Writing_New_Monomorphic_Matchers),
-[polymorphic](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook#Writing_New_Polymorphic_Matchers)).
+[monomorphic](./docs/CookBook.md#writing-new-monomorphic-matchers),
+[polymorphic](./docs/CookBook.md#writing-new-polymorphic-matchers)).
 Matchers defined using `MATCHER()` or `MATCHER_P*()` aren't affected.
 
 ### Developing Google Mock ###

googlemock/configure.ac

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 m4_include(../googletest/m4/acx_pthread.m4)
 
 AC_INIT([Google C++ Mocking Framework],
-        [1.7.0],
+        [1.8.0],
         [googlemock@googlegroups.com],
         [gmock])
 
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ AC_ARG_VAR([GTEST_VERSION],
            [The version of Google Test available.])
 HAVE_BUILT_GTEST="no"
 
-GTEST_MIN_VERSION="1.7.0"
+GTEST_MIN_VERSION="1.8.0"
 
 AS_IF([test "x${enable_external_gtest}" = "xyes"],
       [# Begin filling in variables as we are able.

googlemock/docs/CheatSheet.md

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ can specify it by appending `_WITH_CALLTYPE` to any of the macros
 described in the previous two sections and supplying the calling
 convention as the first argument to the macro. For example,
 ```
-  MOCK_METHOD_1_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, Foo, bool(int n));
+  MOCK_METHOD1_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, Foo, bool(int n));
   MOCK_CONST_METHOD2_WITH_CALLTYPE(STDMETHODCALLTYPE, Bar, int(double x, double y));
 ```
 where `STDMETHODCALLTYPE` is defined by `<objbase.h>` on Windows.
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ match them more flexibly, or get more informative messages, you can use:
 | `SizeIs(m)`              | `argument` is a container whose size matches `m`. E.g. `SizeIs(2)` or `SizeIs(Lt(2))`.                                           |
 | `UnorderedElementsAre(e0, e1, ..., en)` | `argument` has `n + 1` elements, and under some permutation each element matches an `ei` (for a different `i`), which can be a value or a matcher. 0 to 10 arguments are allowed. |
 | `UnorderedElementsAreArray({ e0, e1, ..., en })`, `UnorderedElementsAreArray(array)`, or `UnorderedElementsAreArray(array, count)` | The same as `UnorderedElementsAre()` except that the expected element values/matchers come from an initializer list, STL-style container, or C-style array. |
-| `WhenSorted(m)`          | When `argument` is sorted using the `<` operator, it matches container matcher `m`. E.g. `WhenSorted(UnorderedElementsAre(1, 2, 3))` verifies that `argument` contains elements `1`, `2`, and `3`, ignoring order. |
+| `WhenSorted(m)`          | When `argument` is sorted using the `<` operator, it matches container matcher `m`. E.g. `WhenSorted(ElementsAre(1, 2, 3))` verifies that `argument` contains elements `1`, `2`, and `3`, ignoring order. |
 | `WhenSortedBy(comparator, m)` | The same as `WhenSorted(m)`, except that the given comparator instead of `<` is used to sort `argument`. E.g. `WhenSortedBy(std::greater<int>(), ElementsAre(3, 2, 1))`. |
 
 Notes:

googlemock/docs/CookBook.md

@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ If a mock method has no `EXPECT_CALL` spec but is called, Google Mock
 will print a warning about the "uninteresting call". The rationale is:
 
   * New methods may be added to an interface after a test is written. We shouldn't fail a test just because a method it doesn't know about is called.
-  * However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. If the user believes these calls are harmless, he can add an `EXPECT_CALL()` to suppress the warning.
+  * However, this may also mean there's a bug in the test, so Google Mock shouldn't be silent either. If the user believes these calls are harmless, they can add an `EXPECT_CALL()` to suppress the warning.
 
 However, sometimes you may want to suppress all "uninteresting call"
 warnings, while sometimes you may want the opposite, i.e. to treat all

googlemock/docs/DevGuide.md

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ compile it in the [README](../README.md) file.
 A mocking framework is of no good if itself is not thoroughly tested.
 Tests should be written for any new code, and changes should be
 verified to not break existing tests before they are submitted for
-review. To perform the tests, follow the instructions in [README](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/source/browse/trunk/README) and
+review. To perform the tests, follow the instructions in [README](../README.md) and
 verify that there are no failures.
 
 # Contributing Code #
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ to conform to the style outlined [here](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppg
 Please do submit code. Here's what you need to do:
 
   1. Normally you should make your change against the SVN trunk instead of a branch or a tag, as the latter two are for release control and should be treated mostly as read-only.
-  1. Decide which code you want to submit. A submission should be a set of changes that addresses one issue in the [Google Mock issue tracker](http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/issues/list). Please don't mix more than one logical change per submittal, because it makes the history hard to follow. If you want to make a change that doesn't have a corresponding issue in the issue tracker, please create one.
+  1. Decide which code you want to submit. A submission should be a set of changes that addresses one issue in the [Google Mock issue tracker](https://github.com/google/googletest/issues). Please don't mix more than one logical change per submittal, because it makes the history hard to follow. If you want to make a change that doesn't have a corresponding issue in the issue tracker, please create one.
   1. Also, coordinate with team members that are listed on the issue in question. This ensures that work isn't being duplicated and communicating your plan early also generally leads to better patches.
   1. Ensure that your code adheres to the [Google Mock source code style](#Coding_Style.md).
   1. Ensure that there are unit tests for your code.

googlemock/docs/ForDummies.md

@@ -217,7 +217,8 @@ The macro can be followed by some optional _clauses_ that provide more informati
 This syntax is designed to make an expectation read like English. For example, you can probably guess that
 
 ```
-using ::testing::Return;...
+using ::testing::Return;
+...
 EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX())
     .Times(5)
     .WillOnce(Return(100))
@@ -251,7 +252,8 @@ EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(_));
 A list of built-in matchers can be found in the [CheatSheet](CheatSheet.md). For example, here's the `Ge` (greater than or equal) matcher:
 
 ```
-using ::testing::Ge;...
+using ::testing::Ge;
+...
 EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(Ge(100)));
 ```
 
@@ -280,7 +282,8 @@ First, if the return type of a mock function is a built-in type or a pointer, th
 Second, if a mock function doesn't have a default action, or the default action doesn't suit you, you can specify the action to be taken each time the expectation matches using a series of `WillOnce()` clauses followed by an optional `WillRepeatedly()`. For example,
 
 ```
-using ::testing::Return;...
+using ::testing::Return;
+...
 EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX())
     .WillOnce(Return(100))
     .WillOnce(Return(200))
@@ -290,7 +293,8 @@ EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetX())
 This says that `turtle.GetX()` will be called _exactly three times_ (Google Mock inferred this from how many `WillOnce()` clauses we've written, since we didn't explicitly write `Times()`), and will return 100, 200, and 300 respectively.
 
 ```
-using ::testing::Return;...
+using ::testing::Return;
+...
 EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetY())
     .WillOnce(Return(100))
     .WillOnce(Return(200))
@@ -317,7 +321,8 @@ Instead of returning 100, 101, 102, ..., consecutively, this mock function will
 Time for another quiz! What do you think the following means?
 
 ```
-using ::testing::Return;...
+using ::testing::Return;
+...
 EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GetY())
 .Times(4)
 .WillOnce(Return(100));
@@ -331,7 +336,8 @@ So far we've only shown examples where you have a single expectation. More reali
 By default, when a mock method is invoked, Google Mock will search the expectations in the **reverse order** they are defined, and stop when an active expectation that matches the arguments is found (you can think of it as "newer rules override older ones."). If the matching expectation cannot take any more calls, you will get an upper-bound-violated failure. Here's an example:
 
 ```
-using ::testing::_;...
+using ::testing::_;
+...
 EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(_));  // #1
 EXPECT_CALL(turtle, Forward(10))  // #2
     .Times(2);
@@ -347,7 +353,8 @@ By default, an expectation can match a call even though an earlier expectation h
 Sometimes, you may want all the expected calls to occur in a strict order. To say this in Google Mock is easy:
 
 ```
-using ::testing::InSequence;...
+using ::testing::InSequence;
+...
 TEST(FooTest, DrawsLineSegment) {
   ...
   {
@@ -373,7 +380,8 @@ Now let's do a quick quiz to see how well you can use this mock stuff already. H
 After you've come up with your answer, take a look at ours and compare notes (solve it yourself first - don't cheat!):
 
 ```
-using ::testing::_;...
+using ::testing::_;
+...
 EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GoTo(_, _))  // #1
     .Times(AnyNumber());
 EXPECT_CALL(turtle, GoTo(0, 0))  // #2

googlemock/docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions.md

@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ You cannot mock a variadic function (i.e. a function taking ellipsis
 The problem is that in general, there is _no way_ for a mock object to
 know how many arguments are passed to the variadic method, and what
 the arguments' types are.  Only the _author of the base class_ knows
-the protocol, and we cannot look into his head.
+the protocol, and we cannot look into their head.
 
 Therefore, to mock such a function, the _user_ must teach the mock
 object how to figure out the number of arguments and their types.  One

googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h

@@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ DoAll(Action1 a1, Action2 a2, Action3 a3, Action4 a4, Action5 a5, Action6 a6,
 // MORE INFORMATION:
 //
 // To learn more about using these macros, please search for 'ACTION'
-// on http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook.
+// on https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md
 
 // An internal macro needed for implementing ACTION*().
 #define GMOCK_ACTION_ARG_TYPES_AND_NAMES_UNUSED_\

googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-actions.h.pump

@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ $range j2 2..i
 // MORE INFORMATION:
 //
 // To learn more about using these macros, please search for 'ACTION'
-// on http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook.
+// on https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md
 
 $range i 0..n
 $range k 0..n-1

googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h

@@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ AnyOf(M1 m1, M2 m2, M3 m3, M4 m4, M5 m5, M6 m6, M7 m7, M8 m8, M9 m9, M10 m10) {
 // ================
 //
 // To learn more about using these macros, please search for 'MATCHER'
-// on http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook.
+// on https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md
 
 #define MATCHER(name, description)\
   class name##Matcher {\

googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-generated-matchers.h.pump

@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ $$   // show up in the generated code.
 // ================
 //
 // To learn more about using these macros, please search for 'MATCHER'
-// on http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/wiki/CookBook.
+// on https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md
 
 $range i 0..n
 $for i

googlemock/include/gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h

@@ -1774,7 +1774,7 @@ class FunctionMockerBase : public UntypedFunctionMockerBase {
   // There is no generally useful and implementable semantics of
   // copying a mock object, so copying a mock is usually a user error.
   // Thus we disallow copying function mockers.  If the user really
-  // wants to copy a mock object, he should implement his own copy
+  // wants to copy a mock object, they should implement their own copy
   // operation, for example:
   //
   //   class MockFoo : public Foo {