-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 819
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
08e12de
commit d5e9e75
Showing
4 changed files
with
9 additions
and
11 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
d5e9e75
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In Massachusetts we use landuse=conservation tag a lot. It was from an import. I understand that the tag has problems, but Is boundary=protected_area even rendered? If not, It seems a bit harsh to drop landuse=conservation without boundary=protected_area being setup to support retagging landuse=conservation.
d5e9e75
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rendering of boundary=protected_area is discussed in #603.
d5e9e75
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And leisure=nature_reserve, boundary=national_park tags are already supported (I am unable to check whatever these tags fit current situation in Massachusetts).