Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

revert: Revert #1891 #1900

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 20, 2023
Merged

revert: Revert #1891 #1900

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 20, 2023

Conversation

marsavar
Copy link
Contributor

@marsavar marsavar commented Jun 16, 2023

What does this change?

Reverts #1891, which causes deployments to fail due to custom resources being generated by CDK. It is unclear whether it is a bug, but I've filed a bug report with AWS:

Checklist

  • I have updated the documentation as required for the described changes 1

Footnotes

  1. If you are adding a new construct or pattern, has new documentation been added? If you are amending defaults or changing behaviour, are the existing docs still valid?

@marsavar marsavar requested a review from a team as a code owner June 16, 2023 20:18
@marsavar marsavar changed the title Revert #1891, add extra props to authenticate with external registry fix: Revert #1891, add extra props to authenticate with external registry Jun 16, 2023
@marsavar marsavar changed the title fix: Revert #1891, add extra props to authenticate with external registry fix: Revert #1891add extra props to authenticate with external registry Jun 16, 2023
@marsavar marsavar changed the title fix: Revert #1891add extra props to authenticate with external registry fix: Revert #1891, add extra props to authenticate with external registry Jun 16, 2023
@marsavar marsavar force-pushed the ms-revert-subnet branch 2 times, most recently from 3ed2d7d to 1c63d49 Compare June 20, 2023 12:01
@marsavar marsavar changed the title fix: Revert #1891, add extra props to authenticate with external registry fix: Revert #1891 Jun 20, 2023
Copy link
Member

@akash1810 akash1810 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the prefix of the commits/PR should be revert: on this one? It's a little pedantic, I admit, however it impacts release notes. See the notes for v49.1.0.

Passing subnets to the construct causes CDK to generate custom resources
Reverting this while the issue is being investigated.
@marsavar marsavar changed the title fix: Revert #1891 revert: Revert #1891 Jun 20, 2023
@marsavar
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think the prefix of the commits/PR should be revert: on this one? It's a little pedantic, I admit, however it impacts release notes. See the notes for v49.1.0.

All done!

@marsavar marsavar merged commit c8207ed into main Jun 20, 2023
@marsavar marsavar deleted the ms-revert-subnet branch June 20, 2023 13:24
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 50.7.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants