Update npm package check-dependency-version-consistency to v3.3.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
check-dependency-version-consistency	devDependencies	minor	3.0.3 -> 3.3.0

---

Release Notes

bmish/check-dependency-version-consistency (check-dependency-version-consistency)

v3.3.0

Compare Source

🚀 Enhancement

• #​605 Add new option --dep-type (@​bmish)
• #​606 Add optionalDependencies option to --dep-type (@​bmish)
• #​601 Add peerDependencies option to --dep-type (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.2.1

Compare Source

🐛 Bug Fix

• #​597 Fix publishing issue from v3.2.0 (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.2.0

Compare Source

🚀 Enhancement

• #​591 Add Node API (@​bmish)

🏠 Internal

• #​596 Add some additional npm info to package.json (@​bmish)
• #​594 Harden CI (@​bmish)
• #​595 Test on Node 20 (@​bmish)
• #​593 Enable better TypeScript linting (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.1.1

Compare Source

🐛 Bug Fix

• #​590 pnpm workspace root package should not require name (@​bmish)

Committers: 1

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)

v3.1.0

Compare Source

🚀 Enhancement

• #​574 Support pnpm workspaces (@​bmish)

🐛 Bug Fix

• #​586 Add back error messages when unable to detect workspaces (@​bmish)

📝 Documentation

• #​543 Mention competing offering Yarn Constraints in readme (@​bmish)
• #​544 Mention npm workspaces in readme (@​bmish)

🏠 Internal

• #​561 Add Node v19 to CI (@​ddzz)
• #​548 Add CodeQL (@​bmish)

Committers: 2

• Bryan Mishkin (@​bmish)
• Darius Dzien (@​ddzz)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 20.18%. Comparing base (bbd8886) to head (4f24f5e).
Report is 71 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5101   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   20.18%   20.18%           
=======================================
  Files         510      510           
  Lines       17300    17300           
  Branches     2546     2546           
=======================================
  Hits         3492     3492           
  Misses      13770    13770           
  Partials       38       38           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.18% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	48.46% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	1.06% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.32% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	5.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	73.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	87.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$54.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 372 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.472 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$50.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.580 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$44.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 228 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.794 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$67.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.789 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$59.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 369 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.537 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$39.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.198 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$94.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 475 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$90.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 535 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.196 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$80.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 492 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 638 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.542 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 665 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$41.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.360 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 212 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-30.538 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-32.328 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.755 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-16.488 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-32.271 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-37.265 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.235 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.262 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.53 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.018 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.81 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.763 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$2.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.592 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.43 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.085 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$52.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 398 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}13.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$72.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$24.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.022 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$272 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.51 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.656 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 123 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 136 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.054 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.11 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.87 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.707 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-21.590 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.86 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.181 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph