Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing the spec with mention about the buffer which cannot be non-contiguous. #253

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 22, 2023

Conversation

Narsil
Copy link
Collaborator

@Narsil Narsil commented May 22, 2023

No description provided.

@Narsil Narsil requested a review from mishig25 May 22, 2023 13:53
@Narsil Narsil changed the title Adding a banner to the README. Fixing the spec with mention about the buffer which cannot be non-contiguous. May 22, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@mishig25 mishig25 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm !

@Narsil Narsil merged commit a7969d4 into main May 22, 2023
@Narsil Narsil deleted the fix_readme branch May 22, 2023 14:07
@KerfuffleV2 KerfuffleV2 mentioned this pull request May 22, 2023
@9999years
Copy link

Why was the Cargo.lock removed???

9999years added a commit to 9999years/safetensors that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2024
`Cargo.lock` files were added in huggingface#229 and then removed about a month
later in huggingface#253 (with the justification that "cargo.lock messes up
benchmarks").

Shortly after, the Rust project guidance was updated to encourage
committing lockfiles:

https://blog.rust-lang.org/2023/08/29/committing-lockfiles.html
https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/faq.html#why-have-cargolock-in-version-control
rust-lang/cargo#8728

Let's add the lockfiles back to make builds reproducible and
deterministic, especially for consumers of Python bindings.
@9999years 9999years mentioned this pull request Apr 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants