[ibex refact] new Random #295
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
OK. Ca peut nous servir en effet pour la reproductibilité |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New Random : J'ai des amis qui travaillent sur des algorithmes où le random est primordiale. Malgré le fait de fixer la seed, ils ont eu énormément de problèmes pour retrouver les bugs rencontrés par les utilisateurs dans des cas très particuliers. En effet, le random de C++ ne faisait pas la même suite de nombre pseudo-aléatoire en fonction des machines, des environnements et des versions du compilateur... Du coup, il utilise ce random pseudo-aléatoire (que j'ai inclu) et ça a résolu leur problème.