Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
fix(kubectl-trace): remove status of the project
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Fontana <lo@linux.com>
  • Loading branch information
fntlnz committed Dec 24, 2018
1 parent 0417919 commit c51504d
Showing 1 changed file with 0 additions and 36 deletions.
36 changes: 0 additions & 36 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -73,42 +73,6 @@ Need more programs? Look [here](https://github.com/iovisor/bpftrace/tree/master/

Some of them will not yet work because we don't attach with a TTY already, sorry for that but good news you can contribute it!

## Status of the project

:trophy: All the MVP goals are done!

To consider this project (ready) the goals are:

- [x] basic program run and attach
- [x] list command to list running traces - command: `kubectl trace get`
- [x] delete running traces
- [x] run without attach
- [x] attach command to attach only - command: `kubectl trace attach <program>`
- [x] allow sending signals (probably requires a TTY), so that bpftrace commands can be notified to stop by the user before deletion and give back results


**More things after the MVP:**

<i>The stuff here had been implemented - YaY</i>

<strike>The program is now limited to run programs only on your nodes but the idea is to have the ability to attach only to the user namespace of a pod, like:

```
kubectl trace run pod/<pod-name> -f read.bt
```

And even on a specific container

```
kubectl trace run pod/<pod-name> -c <container> f read.bt
```

So I would say, the next thing is to run bpftrace programs at a pod scope other than at node scope.</strike>

**bpftrace work**

I also plan to contribute some IO functions to bpftrace to send data to a backend database like InfluxDB instead of only stdout
because that would enable having things like graphs showing

## Contributing

Expand Down

0 comments on commit c51504d

Please sign in to comment.