We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The licence in the deb installer shows up as proprietary:
Open the .deb file on Ubuntu 21.10
BSD-3-Clause License should be shown
BSD-3-Clause License
GitHub does not show the licence too:
compare to RetroLab:
This could be due to a fragment copied over from core which we do not actually have in the repository:
https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab-desktop/pull/191/files/a7d8295f3702faf56d2b1c1106afd0e3fe51eab8#diff-c693279643b8cd5d248172d9c22cb7cf4ed163a3c98c8a3f69c2717edd3eacb7
as discussed in #191 (comment) we should remove it
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So this is an upstream bug, tracked in electron-userland/electron-builder#4270, https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/875 and https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/-/issues/833
Sorry, something went wrong.
Thanks to #360 the license is now detected on GitHub:
The .deb installer issue is upstream, but we can keep it open for informative purposes (so that it is clear to users).
No branches or pull requests
Description
The licence in the deb installer shows up as proprietary:
Reproduce
Open the .deb file on Ubuntu 21.10
Expected behavior
BSD-3-Clause License
should be shownContext
GitHub does not show the licence too:
compare to RetroLab:
This could be due to a fragment copied over from core which we do not actually have in the repository:
https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab-desktop/pull/191/files/a7d8295f3702faf56d2b1c1106afd0e3fe51eab8#diff-c693279643b8cd5d248172d9c22cb7cf4ed163a3c98c8a3f69c2717edd3eacb7
as discussed in #191 (comment) we should remove it
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: