RFC 0008: Builtin blocktypes

[felix-oq]

Preparation for #217

Rendered markdown: https://github.com/jvalue/jayvee/blob/rfc-0008-builtin-blocktypes/rfc/0008-builtin-blocktypes/README.md

[georg-schwarz]

Nice, looks really intuitive to me! Also hyped for the extension of this work towards composite blocks! ;-)

[georg-schwarz]

LGTM. We should probably look into the docs as well for the io-type case changes, although we don't have a real documentation therefore yet.

[georg-schwarz]

Btw, I'm missing a mechanism to add documentation (description and examples) that we previously had in the BlockMetaInf mechanism. Any ideas how that would be approached?

[felix-oq]

Btw, I'm missing a mechanism to add documentation (description and examples) that we previously had in the BlockMetaInf mechanism. Any ideas how that would be approached?

For now, I think it would be fine to leave that aspect in the langauge server (i.e. the language server "magically" provides documentation for builtin block types).

On the long run, we could use structured comments to describe documentation, similar to how it's done in programming languages. Recently I've noticed, that Langium offers some kind of JSDoc support, but I haven't looked into it so far: https://github.com/langium/langium/blob/main/packages/langium/CHANGELOG.md#jsdoc-support

[rhazn]

We should merge this, right @georg-schwarz ? I can take over creating an implementation issue.

[georg-schwarz]

We should probably change the responsible person.

[rhazn]

Done in the latest commit, I think then we can go like this, right? If we need to iterate on this I'd rather create a new PR.