-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Preview - Keycloak Test Framework #488
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
2d89793
to
46b3979
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Content-wise I don't find it missing anything. It's great as it is now.
I ran it through a grammar checker and included some of my rephrasing suggestions.
Feel free to ignore any of it.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Hanusovsky <lhanusov@redhat.com>
|
||
== Brighter Future? | ||
|
||
Keycloak team had started a https://github.com/orgs/keycloak/projects/42[joint effort] between the engineering and quality engineering people to design a new test framework (May 2024). It had been initiated with a prototype to verify if our thoughts were feasible. The prototype was based on the _JUnit5_ testing framework, specifically to implement _JUnit5_ callback classes which extend the default test lifecycle functionality and provide custom inject annotations, like _@KeycloakIntegrationTest_, _@InjectWebDriver_ or _@InjectRealm_. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just say Keycloak team - engineering and quality engineering is a RH thing, and we're all just the Keycloak team :)
== Are you curious about where to start? | ||
We suggest reading the https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/main/test-framework/README.md[user guide], which will provide a basic overview of how the framework works and should be used. If this is not enough, you can also check https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/main/test-poc/examples[examples module]. | ||
|
||
For extension developers we recommend to look into the showcase example on how to start _Keycloak_ with their custom provider - link. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a note that we need to update this before publishing the blog
|
||
For extension developers we recommend to look into the showcase example on how to start _Keycloak_ with their custom provider - link. | ||
|
||
Once you find a bug, want to discuss something, or propose a new enhancement, please follow this GitHub feedback https://www.github.com/discussion#blabla[discussion] link. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a note that we need to update this before publishing the blog
|
||
== Coming Soon | ||
|
||
Preview - https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/main/test-framework[_Keycloak Test Framework_] will be introduced in _Keycloak Nightly_ builds. We plan to add more features, which will cover 80% of functionalities currently available in the https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/main/testsuite[integration test suite]. We also plan to introduce some new concepts, e.g. _@KeycloakTest_ annotation, which will add an option to test providers without the _Keycloak_ server running. It should be based on the _KeycloakSession_ class. Other interesting features should be parallel execution on a GitHub runner, adding a custom extension to a Keycloak server, or enabling a Keycloak cluster setup. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is available, not will be ;)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove 80%, and say something like cover enough for most tests...
|
||
== Brighter Future? | ||
|
||
Keycloak team had started a https://github.com/orgs/keycloak/projects/42[joint effort] between the engineering and quality engineering people to design a new test framework (May 2024). It had been initiated with a prototype to verify if our thoughts were feasible. The prototype was based on the _JUnit5_ testing framework, specifically to implement _JUnit5_ callback classes which extend the default test lifecycle functionality and provide custom inject annotations, like _@KeycloakIntegrationTest_, _@InjectWebDriver_ or _@InjectRealm_. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The board is private, and not visible to everyone. So we either remove the link, or cleanup the board and make it public
|
||
For extension developers we recommend to look into the showcase example on how to start _Keycloak_ with their custom provider - link. | ||
|
||
Once you find a bug, want to discuss something, or propose a new enhancement, please follow this GitHub feedback https://www.github.com/discussion#blabla[discussion] link. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Once you find a bug, want to discuss something, or propose a new enhancement, please follow this GitHub feedback https://www.github.com/discussion#blabla[discussion] link. | |
If you find a bug, want to discuss something, or propose a new enhancement, please follow this GitHub feedback https://www.github.com/discussion#blabla[discussion] link. |
Closes #32399