Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests, PR feedback #14

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 21, 2022
Merged

Conversation

krwq
Copy link
Owner

@krwq krwq commented Jun 21, 2022

No description provided.

{
internal sealed class JsonPropertyDictionaryJsonPropertyValueList : IList<JsonPropertyInfo>
{
private readonly JsonPropertyDictionary<JsonPropertyInfo> _parent;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can the two types be merged perhaps?

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Possibly but that would require a bit more thinking. This one is editing and committing changes into the dictionary while the other one is just dictionary. I'll leave as is for now, we can update it after we fix other issues


namespace System.Text.Json
{
internal sealed class JsonPropertyDictionaryJsonPropertyValueList : IList<JsonPropertyInfo>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That type might warrant a DebuggerDisplayAttribute, possible needed in some of the other types like JsonTypeInfo and JsonPropertyInfo.

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll leave this off for now since we don't usually do that for all IList<T>

@krwq krwq merged commit 01119a8 into contract-customization Jun 21, 2022
krwq added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2022
* Initial implementation for contract customization

fix build errors

Move converter rooting to DefaultJsonTypeInfoResolver so that it can be used standalone

Fix ConfigurationList.IsReadOnly

Minor refactorings (#1)

* Makes the following changes:

* Move singleton initialization for DefaultTypeInfoResolver behind a static property.
* Consolidate JsonSerializerContext & IJsonTypeInfoResolver values to a single field.
* Move reflection fallback logic away from JsonSerializerContext and into JsonSerializerOptions

* Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/JsonSerializerOptions.cs

* remove testing of removed field

Simplify the JsonTypeInfo.CreateObject implemenetation (#2)

* Simplify the JsonTypeInfo.CreateObject implemenetation

* Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/Metadata/JsonTypeInfoOfT.cs

* Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/Metadata/JsonTypeInfoOfT.cs

Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Wicher <mordotymoja@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Wicher <mordotymoja@gmail.com>

Tests and fixes for JsonTypeInfoKind.None

TypeInfo type mismatch tests

Allow setting NumberHandling on JsonTypeInfoKind.None

test resolver returning wrong type of options

JsonTypeInfo/JsonPropertyInfo mutability tests

rename test file

Move default converter rooting responsibility behind DefaultJsonTypeInfoResolver (#3)

* Move default converter rooting responsibility behind DefaultJsonTypeInfoResolver

* address feedback

Add simple test for using JsonTypeInfo<T> with APIs directly taking it

fix and tests for untyped/typed CreateObject

uncomment test cases, remove todo

More tests and tiny fixes

Add a JsonTypeInfoResolver.Combine test for JsonSerializerContext (#4)

* Fix JsonTypeInfoResolver.Combine for JsonSerializerContext

* Break up failing test

Fix simple scenarios for combining contexts (#6)

* Fix simple scenarios for combining contexts

* feedback

JsonSerializerContext combine test with different camel casing

Remove unneeded virtual calls & branching when accessing Get & Set delegates (#7)

JsonPropertyInfo tests everything minus ShouldSerialize & NumberHandling

Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/JsonConverterOfT.cs

Update src/libraries/System.Text.Json/src/System/Text/Json/Serialization/JsonConverterOfT.cs

throw InvalidOperationException rather than ArgumentNullException for source gen when PropertyInfo.Name is assigned through JsonPropertyInfoValues

tests for duplicated property names and JsonPropertyInfo.NumberHandling

Add tests for NumberHandling and failing tests for ShouldSerialize

disable the failing test and add extra checks

disable remainder of the failing ShouldSerialize tests, fix working one

Fix ShouldSerialize and IgnoreCondition interop

Add failing tests for CreateObject + parametrized constructors

Fix CreateObject support for JsonConstructor types (#10)

* Fix CreateObject support for JsonConstructor types

* address feedback

Make contexts more combinator friendly (#9)

* Make contexts more combinator friendly

* remove converter cache

* redesign test to account for JsonConstructorAttribute

* Combine unit tests

* address feedback

* Add acceptance tests for DataContract attributes & Specified pattern (#11)

* Add private field serialization acceptance test (#13)

* tests, PR feedback (#14)

* PR feedback and extra tests

* Shorten class name, remove incorrect check (not true for polimorphic cases)

* Make parameter matching for custom properties map property Name with parameter (#16)

* Test static initialization with JsonTypeInfo (#17)

* Fix test failures and proper fix this time (#18)

* Fix test failures and proper fix this time

* reinstate ActiveIssueAttribute

* PR feedback and adjust couple of tests which don't set TypeInfoResolver

* fix IAsyncEnumerable tests

* Lock JsonSerializerOptions in JsonTypeInfo.EnsureConfigured()

Co-authored-by: Eirik Tsarpalis <eirik.tsarpalis@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Eirik Tsarpalis <eirik.tsarpalis@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants