Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GEP: Provide a standard way to configure per-Gateway Infrastructure #1867

Closed
howardjohn opened this issue Mar 22, 2023 · 13 comments · Fixed by #1868 or #3272
Closed

GEP: Provide a standard way to configure per-Gateway Infrastructure #1867

howardjohn opened this issue Mar 22, 2023 · 13 comments · Fixed by #1868 or #3272
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. kind/gep PRs related to Gateway Enhancement Proposal(GEP) lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence.

Comments

@howardjohn
Copy link
Contributor

howardjohn commented Mar 22, 2023

What would you like to be added: a standard way to configure per-Gateway Infrastructure

Why this is needed: Currently this is only configurable on a Cluster scoped resource, which has a variety of issues

GEP: #1868

@howardjohn howardjohn added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Mar 22, 2023
@howardjohn
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign

@shaneutt shaneutt added the needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. label Mar 22, 2023
@shaneutt shaneutt added priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Apr 12, 2023
@robscott
Copy link
Member

robscott commented Dec 1, 2023

Leaving this open until this GEP either graduates to standard or is removed from the API.

/kind gep
/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/gep PRs related to Gateway Enhancement Proposal(GEP) label Dec 1, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Dec 1, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@robscott: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

Leaving this open until this GEP either graduates to standard or is removed from the API.

/kind gep
/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@robscott robscott changed the title Provide a standard way to configure per-Gateway Infrastructure GEP: Provide a standard way to configure per-Gateway Infrastructure Dec 2, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 1, 2024
@youngnick
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Mar 6, 2024
@keithmattix
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @mikemorris

@keithmattix
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @keithmattix

@keithmattix
Copy link
Contributor

keithmattix commented Jun 17, 2024

Action items for standard:

  • Survey implementations to ensure we have enough (3+) and/or encourage more implementations to support this feature.
  • Write documentation
  • Updates to GEP, docs, and API types to bump status to standard.

@keithmattix
Copy link
Contributor

Implementations: Istio, Envoy Gateway,? Is anyone aware of more?

@youngnick
Copy link
Contributor

Cilium also supports labels and annotations in infrastructure.

@jbohanon
Copy link

Gloo Gateway supports attaching implementation-specific config to a Gateway via annotation with the intention of moving the attachment to infrastructure once the GEP is accepted and the field is considered stable.

@keithmattix
Copy link
Contributor

I think the only tasks left before this gets closed out is to bump some API types

@youngnick
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, we will need to remove the experimental tags from the infrastructure field and the child labels and annotations fields, and check that we document the required feature name in those fields. Those actions will move this field to GA in 1.2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. kind/gep PRs related to Gateway Enhancement Proposal(GEP) lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence.
Projects
Status: Implementable
9 participants