-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 234
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Add a column to workload indicating if it is finished #2615
Conversation
Hi @highpon. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue canceled.
|
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 2c2e17682b1067991120190bd9bffa5f96cf2f22
|
/ok-to-test I think you need to run |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 008138b3e8dc5f6a3feda61b8721080f7520453d
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alculquicondor, highpon, tenzen-y The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
When retrieving information about workload resources via the kubectl get command, we are unable to determine whether the workload had completed. It would be more convenient to know if the workload had finished.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #2609
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?