Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add scaffolding for supporting additional whitebox testing #603

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2019
Merged

Add scaffolding for supporting additional whitebox testing #603

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2019

Conversation

rramkumar1
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 10, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 10, 2019
@rramkumar1 rramkumar1 force-pushed the whitebox-testing branch 2 times, most recently from f63a171 to 56f650a Compare January 15, 2019 15:44
@rramkumar1 rramkumar1 changed the title [WIP] Add scaffolding for supporting additional whitebox testing Add scaffolding for supporting additional whitebox testing Jan 15, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 15, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 15, 2019
@rramkumar1 rramkumar1 added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Apr 16, 2019
@bowei
Copy link
Member

bowei commented Aug 12, 2019

looks good -- you have merge conflicts though

@rramkumar1 rramkumar1 removed the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Sep 27, 2019
@bowei
Copy link
Member

bowei commented Sep 27, 2019

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 27, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bowei, rramkumar1

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 60afa35 into kubernetes:master Sep 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bowei bowei Awaiting requested review from bowei

@thockin thockin Awaiting requested review from thockin

Assignees

@bowei bowei

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@rramkumar1 @fejta-bot @bowei @k8s-ci-robot