Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better error in Lark.parse when using on_error when parser!=lalr (issue #1311) #1460

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2024

Conversation

erezsh
Copy link
Member

@erezsh erezsh commented Sep 1, 2024

Not much to review, but I'll still leave it up for comments for a while

@erezsh erezsh requested a review from MegaIng September 1, 2024 09:18
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.78%. Comparing base (5e07379) to head (84e9984).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1460   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.78%   89.78%           
=======================================
  Files          52       52           
  Lines        7819     7825    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         7020     7026    +6     
  Misses        799      799           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 89.78% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@MegaIng MegaIng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, not much to review. LGTM

@erezsh erezsh merged commit 5faea92 into master Sep 1, 2024
23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants