Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added "Introduction to Prompt Engineering" #564

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Mar 18, 2024

Conversation

sfnicholas
Copy link
Contributor

Created section for Technical Techniques and Function Calling within Applications

Add documentation on prompt engineering techniques: zero-shot, few-shot learning, and chain-of-thought prompting.
Add tutorial within Applications, for function calling. Including introduction and code demo
Add link to Introduction to Prompt Engineering
Copy link
Contributor

@Adrianhui123 Adrianhui123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Add a heading for Function Calling section (## in markdown) for clarity and organization of the mark down file
  2. In the technical techniques section, add some appliction tips so software students can follow along and would be more beneficial for software practices

1. Added application tips within technical technique
2. Added subheadings within Function Calling
Copy link
Contributor

@Adrianhui123 Adrianhui123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ensure consistency in the use of headers. For application tips, i would consider adding a ### for a good hierarchical structure

Added #### for Application Tips
Copy link
Contributor

@Adrianhui123 Adrianhui123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For function calling, focus on the technical accuracy of the function calling process and the code example. Ensure that the example provided is realistic and can be practically implemented, double check that

@sfnicholas
Copy link
Contributor Author

I double checked my code. I believe it has clear enough technical accuracy. Do you think my code example is easy to understand?

@Adrianhui123
Copy link
Contributor

I double checked my code. I believe it has clear enough technical accuracy. Do you think my code example is easy to understand?

Ok i see

Added Table of Contents for Technical Part and Application Part
Edit typo within table of contents
@JasonW029 JasonW029 merged commit 5865396 into learning-software-engineering:main Mar 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants