chore: rm rust-libp2p v0.49 and v0.50, update v0.52 #253
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me. Thank you for porting our Makefile to the new version.lock mechanism @p-shahi!
Substrate is on v0.52.1. Lighthouse is upgrading to v0.52. Most downloaded version is v0.52.1.
When downloading a tag off of GitHub the folder structure differs to a download of a commit sha.
|
@mxinden I pushed some more fixes to the makefile. it seems like it's failing now as it doesn't detect webrtc-direct as a transport? I haven't looked further but tagging you in case you've seen something like this before. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I investigated a bit.
The v0.51.3 tag points (as it should) to the commit we cut the libp2p v0.51.3 release off of. Since then we have cut many patch releases of sub-crates. But those patch releases of sub-crates don't require an additional patch release of the meta crate (i.e. libp2p). Downstream users can upgrade their sub-crate version without having to upgrade the meta crate version.
The previously specified commitSha pointed to the latest commit compatible with the libp2p v0.51.3 release. I.e. it contained all sub-crate patch releases. Thus CI was green.
The 0.51.3 git tag only points to the much older v0.51.3 release commit. It does not contain the patches of the sub-crates. Thus CI fails.
You can see the difference here.
libp2p/rust-libp2p@3c5940a...8c26c61
We could cut v0.51.4. But I am hesitant to do so for CI only.
Is the move from commitSha to version relevant? If not, I suggest we don't do it for v0.51.3. In other words I suggest leaving this file untouched.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is the move from commitSha to version relevant? If not, I suggest we don't do it for v0.51.3. In other words I suggest leaving this file untouched.
I am ok with that. Thank you for investigating!
| @@ -1,23 +1,35 @@ | |||
| image_name := rust-v0.52 | |||
| commitSha := 68e6bf9c3cd0d3317415a5ba31a62e91cba0a5d2 | |||
| version := 0.52.1 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| version := 0.52.1 | |
| version := 0.52.2 |
I released libp2p v0.52.2 today. Want to include it in this pull request?
No worries in case you don't want to mix these efforts in the same PR. I am happy to do a follow-up pull request.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'll include 0.52.2 in here 👍
p-shahi
changed the title
I'm not sure if we should still test v0.49 and v0.50 given that they are quite old (from 2022)
0.51 and 0.52 have been out for some time now.
Wdyt @mxinden @thomaseizinger? If there are notable/many rust-libp2p users still relying on 0.50 or 0.49, we should keep them