Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark View Annotation API as non-experimental #1260

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2022

Conversation

kiryldz
Copy link
Contributor

@kiryldz kiryldz commented Apr 5, 2022

Summary of changes

User impact (optional)

Pull request checklist:

  • Briefly describe the changes in this PR.
  • Include before/after visuals or gifs if this PR includes visual changes.
  • Write tests for all new functionality. If tests were not written, please explain why.
  • Optimize code for java consumption (@JvmOverloads, @file:JvmName, etc).
  • Add example if relevant.
  • Document any changes to public APIs.
  • Run make update-api to update generated api files, if there's public API changes, otherwise the verify-api-* CI steps might fail.
  • Update CHANGELOG.md or use the label 'skip changelog', otherwise check changelog CI step will fail.
  • If this PR is a v10.[version] release branch fix / enhancement, merge it to main firstly and then port to v10.[version] release branch.

Fixes: < Link to related issues that will be fixed by this pull request, if they exist >

PRs must be submitted under the terms of our Contributor License Agreement CLA.

@kiryldz kiryldz requested a review from a team as a code owner April 5, 2022 11:25
@kiryldz kiryldz self-assigned this Apr 5, 2022
@kiryldz kiryldz force-pushed the kdz-drop-experimental-view-annotations branch from c7e20fc to c09516b Compare April 5, 2022 11:57
@kiryldz kiryldz merged commit 3faf4dc into main Apr 5, 2022
@kiryldz kiryldz deleted the kdz-drop-experimental-view-annotations branch April 5, 2022 12:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants