Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Defib challenge badge #1217

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 20, 2018
Merged

Defib challenge badge #1217

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 20, 2018

Conversation

joshbruce
Copy link
Member

Marked version: 0.3.19

Markdown flavor: CommonMark & GitHub Flavored Markdown

Description

Adds limited badge related to the defibrillator challenge (#1216).

Contributor

  • Test(s) exist to ensure functionality and minimize regression (if no tests added, list tests covering this PR); or,
  • no tests required for this PR.
  • If submitting new feature, it has been documented in the appropriate places.

Committer

In most cases, this should be a different person than the contributor.

  • Draft GitHub release notes have been updated.
  • CI is green (no forced merge required).
  • Merge PR

@joshbruce joshbruce added the category: docs Documentation changes label Apr 13, 2018
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ A note on "decision making authority". This is related to submitting PRs and the
|Name |GiHub handle |Decision making |Badges of honor (tag for questions) |
|:--------------|:--------------|:----------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|Jamie Davis |@davisjam |Seeker of Security | |
|Steven |@styfle |Open source, of course and GitHub Guru | |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did you remove me? Am I not allowed to review PRs?

Copy link
Member Author

@joshbruce joshbruce Apr 13, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Of course. You were in there twice. Once in the admin section and once in the committer section. They're concentric circles. Publishers == admins == committers == contributors == users. That's why I'm not in the committers table either. :)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Jamie and Tony aren't admins though. Make sense?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Trust me, if it were that big of a shift...it would have been a separate PR. ;)

styfle
styfle previously approved these changes Apr 13, 2018
@styfle
Copy link
Member

styfle commented Apr 13, 2018

It was misleading because in the PR description there is no mention of removing a duplicate

@joshbruce
Copy link
Member Author

@styfle: That's fair. Will note for future. Thought the commit message would have been enough. Thanks for asking definitely see where the confusion came from.

@styfle
Copy link
Member

styfle commented Apr 20, 2018

Waiting on @UziTech or @davisjam

UziTech
UziTech previously approved these changes Apr 20, 2018
Copy link
Member

@UziTech UziTech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@styfle
Copy link
Member

styfle commented Apr 20, 2018

For some reason, Snyk looks stuck.
Maybe we should change this check so that it's not required to merge a PR.

Maybe the Snyk team can help use determine why this check is stuck 😅
@adrukh @aarlaud @karenyavine

@joshbruce joshbruce dismissed stale reviews from UziTech and styfle via 74ee8c1 April 20, 2018 14:16
@styfle
Copy link
Member

styfle commented Apr 20, 2018

Ok it looks like that merge fixed the Snyk check.
Needs one more approval.

@styfle styfle merged commit f95dd44 into markedjs:master Apr 20, 2018
@adrukh
Copy link

adrukh commented Apr 22, 2018

👋

Closing and reopening the PR (or pushing a new commit) re-triggers the check and gives us a second chance to succeed. We'll take a look why that second chance was needed, thanks for bearing with us!

zhenalexfan pushed a commit to zhenalexfan/MarkdownHan that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category: docs Documentation changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants