[Backport staging] Correctly handle limited sync responses by resetting the thread timeline

spec/unit/models/thread.spec.ts

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ import { Thread, THREAD_RELATION_TYPE, ThreadEvent } from "../../../src/models/t
 import { mkThread } from "../../test-utils/thread";
 import { TestClient } from "../../TestClient";
 import { emitPromise, mkMessage, mock } from "../../test-utils/test-utils";
-import { EventStatus, MatrixEvent } from "../../../src";
+import { Direction, EventStatus, MatrixEvent } from "../../../src";
 import { ReceiptType } from "../../../src/@types/read_receipts";
 import { getMockClientWithEventEmitter, mockClientMethodsUser } from "../../test-utils/client";
 import { ReEmitter } from "../../../src/ReEmitter";
@@ -283,4 +283,143 @@ describe("Thread", () => {
             expect(thread2.getEventReadUpTo(myUserId)).toBe(null);
         });
     });
+
+    describe("resetLiveTimeline", () => {
+        // ResetLiveTimeline is used when we have missing messages between the current live timeline's end and newly
+        // received messages. In that case, we want to replace the existing live timeline. To ensure pagination
+        // continues working correctly, new pagination tokens need to be set on both the old live timeline (which is
+        // now a regular timeline) and the new live timeline.
+        it("replaces the live timeline and correctly sets pagination tokens", async () => {
+            const myUserId = "@bob:example.org";
+            const testClient = new TestClient(myUserId, "DEVICE", "ACCESS_TOKEN", undefined, {
+                timelineSupport: false,
+            });
+            const client = testClient.client;
+            const room = new Room("123", client, myUserId, {
+                pendingEventOrdering: PendingEventOrdering.Detached,
+            });
+
+            jest.spyOn(client, "getRoom").mockReturnValue(room);
+
+            const { thread } = mkThread({
+                room,
+                client,
+                authorId: myUserId,
+                participantUserIds: ["@alice:example.org"],
+                length: 3,
+            });
+            await emitPromise(thread, ThreadEvent.Update);
+            expect(thread.length).toBe(2);
+
+            jest.spyOn(client, "createMessagesRequest").mockImplementation((_, token) =>
+                Promise.resolve({
+                    chunk: [],
+                    start: `${token}-new`,
+                    end: `${token}-new`,
+                }),
+            );
+
+            function timelines(): [string | null, string | null][] {
+                return thread.timelineSet
+                    .getTimelines()
+                    .map((it) => [it.getPaginationToken(Direction.Backward), it.getPaginationToken(Direction.Forward)]);
+            }
+
+            expect(timelines()).toEqual([[null, null]]);
+            const promise = thread.resetLiveTimeline("b1", "f1");
+            expect(timelines()).toEqual([
+                [null, "f1"],
+                ["b1", null],
+            ]);
+            await promise;
+            expect(timelines()).toEqual([
+                [null, "f1-new"],
+                ["b1-new", null],
+            ]);
+        });
+
+        // As the pagination tokens cannot be used right now, resetLiveTimeline needs to replace them before they can
+        // be used. But if in the future the bug in synapse is fixed, and they can actually be used, we can get into a
+        // state where the client has paginated (and changed the tokens) while resetLiveTimeline tries to set the
+        // corrected tokens. To prevent such a race condition, we make sure that resetLiveTimeline respects any
+        // changes done to the pagination tokens.
+        it("replaces the live timeline but does not replace changed pagination tokens", async () => {
+            const myUserId = "@bob:example.org";
+            const testClient = new TestClient(myUserId, "DEVICE", "ACCESS_TOKEN", undefined, {
+                timelineSupport: false,
+            });
+            const client = testClient.client;
+            const room = new Room("123", client, myUserId, {
+                pendingEventOrdering: PendingEventOrdering.Detached,
+            });
+
+            jest.spyOn(client, "getRoom").mockReturnValue(room);
+
+            const { thread } = mkThread({
+                room,
+                client,
+                authorId: myUserId,
+                participantUserIds: ["@alice:example.org"],
+                length: 3,
+            });
+            await emitPromise(thread, ThreadEvent.Update);
+            expect(thread.length).toBe(2);
+
+            jest.spyOn(client, "createMessagesRequest").mockImplementation((_, token) =>
+                Promise.resolve({
+                    chunk: [],
+                    start: `${token}-new`,
+                    end: `${token}-new`,
+                }),
+            );
+
+            function timelines(): [string | null, string | null][] {
+                return thread.timelineSet
+                    .getTimelines()
+                    .map((it) => [it.getPaginationToken(Direction.Backward), it.getPaginationToken(Direction.Forward)]);
+            }
+
+            expect(timelines()).toEqual([[null, null]]);
+            const promise = thread.resetLiveTimeline("b1", "f1");
+            expect(timelines()).toEqual([
+                [null, "f1"],
+                ["b1", null],
+            ]);
+            thread.timelineSet.getTimelines()[0].setPaginationToken("f2", Direction.Forward);
+            thread.timelineSet.getTimelines()[1].setPaginationToken("b2", Direction.Backward);
+            await promise;
+            expect(timelines()).toEqual([
+                [null, "f2"],
+                ["b2", null],
+            ]);
+        });
+
+        it("is correctly called by the room", async () => {
+            const myUserId = "@bob:example.org";
+            const testClient = new TestClient(myUserId, "DEVICE", "ACCESS_TOKEN", undefined, {
+                timelineSupport: false,
+            });
+            const client = testClient.client;
+            const room = new Room("123", client, myUserId, {
+                pendingEventOrdering: PendingEventOrdering.Detached,
+            });
+
+            jest.spyOn(client, "getRoom").mockReturnValue(room);
+
+            const { thread } = mkThread({
+                room,
+                client,
+                authorId: myUserId,
+                participantUserIds: ["@alice:example.org"],
+                length: 3,
+            });
+            await emitPromise(thread, ThreadEvent.Update);
+            expect(thread.length).toBe(2);
+            const mock = jest.spyOn(thread, "resetLiveTimeline");
+            mock.mockReturnValue(Promise.resolve());
+
+            room.resetLiveTimeline("b1", "f1");
+            expect(mock).toHaveBeenCalledWith("b1", "f1");
+        });
+    });
 });

src/models/room.ts

@@ -1114,6 +1114,9 @@ export class Room extends ReadReceipt<RoomEmittedEvents, RoomEventHandlerMap> {
         for (const timelineSet of this.timelineSets) {
             timelineSet.resetLiveTimeline(backPaginationToken ?? undefined, forwardPaginationToken ?? undefined);
         }
+        for (const thread of this.threads.values()) {
+            thread.resetLiveTimeline(backPaginationToken, forwardPaginationToken);
+        }
 
         this.fixUpLegacyTimelineFields();
     }
@@ -1223,7 +1226,7 @@ export class Room extends ReadReceipt<RoomEmittedEvents, RoomEventHandlerMap> {
         const event = this.findEventById(eventId);
         const thread = this.findThreadForEvent(event);
         if (thread) {
-            return thread.timelineSet.getLiveTimeline();
+            return thread.timelineSet.getTimelineForEvent(eventId);
         } else {
             return this.getUnfilteredTimelineSet().getTimelineForEvent(eventId);
         }

src/models/thread.ts

@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ export class Thread extends ReadReceipt<EmittedEvents, EventHandlerMap> {
         this.setEventMetadata(event);
 
         const lastReply = this.lastReply();
-        const isNewestReply = !lastReply || event.localTimestamp > lastReply!.localTimestamp;
+        const isNewestReply = !lastReply || event.localTimestamp >= lastReply!.localTimestamp;
 
         // Add all incoming events to the thread's timeline set when there's  no server support
         if (!Thread.hasServerSideSupport) {
@@ -358,6 +358,63 @@ export class Thread extends ReadReceipt<EmittedEvents, EventHandlerMap> {
         this.pendingReplyCount = pendingEvents.length;
     }
 
+    /**
+     * Reset the live timeline of all timelineSets, and start new ones.
+     *
+     * <p>This is used when /sync returns a 'limited' timeline. 'Limited' means that there's a gap between the messages
+     * /sync returned, and the last known message in our timeline. In such a case, our live timeline isn't live anymore
+     * and has to be replaced by a new one. To make sure we can continue paginating our timelines correctly, we have to
+     * set new pagination tokens on the old and the new timeline.
+     *
+     * @param backPaginationToken -   token for back-paginating the new timeline
+     * @param forwardPaginationToken - token for forward-paginating the old live timeline,
+     * if absent or null, all timelines are reset, removing old ones (including the previous live
+     * timeline which would otherwise be unable to paginate forwards without this token).
+     * Removing just the old live timeline whilst preserving previous ones is not supported.
+     */
+    public async resetLiveTimeline(
+        backPaginationToken?: string | null,
+        forwardPaginationToken?: string | null,
+    ): Promise<void> {
+        const oldLive = this.liveTimeline;
+        this.timelineSet.resetLiveTimeline(backPaginationToken ?? undefined, forwardPaginationToken ?? undefined);
+        const newLive = this.liveTimeline;
+
+        // FIXME: Remove the following as soon as https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/14830 is resolved.
+        //
+        // The pagination API for thread timelines currently can't handle the type of pagination tokens returned by sync
+        //
+        // To make this work anyway, we'll have to transform them into one of the types that the API can handle.
+        // One option is passing the tokens to /messages, which can handle sync tokens, and returns the right format.
+        // /messages does not return new tokens on requests with a limit of 0.
+        // This means our timelines might overlap a slight bit, but that's not an issue, as we deduplicate messages
+        // anyway.
+
+        let newBackward: string | undefined;
+        let oldForward: string | undefined;
+        if (backPaginationToken) {
+            const res = await this.client.createMessagesRequest(this.roomId, backPaginationToken, 1, Direction.Forward);
+            newBackward = res.end;
+        }
+        if (forwardPaginationToken) {
+            const res = await this.client.createMessagesRequest(
+                this.roomId,
+                forwardPaginationToken,
+                1,
+                Direction.Backward,
+            );
+            oldForward = res.start;
+        }
+        // Only replace the token if we don't have paginated away from this position already. This situation doesn't
+        // occur today, but if the above issue is resolved, we'd have to go down this path.
+        if (forwardPaginationToken && oldLive.getPaginationToken(Direction.Forward) === forwardPaginationToken) {
+            oldLive.setPaginationToken(oldForward ?? null, Direction.Forward);
+        }
+        if (backPaginationToken && newLive.getPaginationToken(Direction.Backward) === backPaginationToken) {
+            newLive.setPaginationToken(newBackward ?? null, Direction.Backward);
+        }
+    }
+
     private async updateThreadMetadata(): Promise<void> {
         this.updatePendingReplyCount();