Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Misc clarifications to threading MSCs #3899

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 27, 2022
Merged

Conversation

turt2live
Copy link
Member

@turt2live turt2live commented Sep 27, 2022

This is reviewable commit-by-commit

In this PR we cover some of the nuances discovered while writing the actual spec for threads.

Synapse/implementation proof:

Copy link
Member

@clokep clokep left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! 👍

Comment on lines +54 to +56
* `latest_event`: The most recent event (topologically) which relates to this event, with
`rel_type` of `m.thread`. Events sent by [ignored users](https://spec.matrix.org/v1.3/client-server-api/#ignoring-users)
are not considered for the latest event.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We discussed this over Matrix, it makes sense to make this explicit here, but it really is just following the guidance of MSC2675:

Information about relations sent from ignored users must never be sent to the client, either in aggregations or discrete relation events. This is to let you block someone from harassing you with emoji reactions (or using edits as a side-channel to harass you). Therefore, it is possible that different users will see different aggregations (a different last edit, or a different reaction count) on an event.

@turt2live turt2live merged commit 85e0444 into main Sep 27, 2022
@turt2live turt2live deleted the travis/fix/threads-misc branch September 27, 2022 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants