Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Module template retrofit: GitHub metadata and Actions #142

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 30, 2021
Merged

Conversation

reivilibre
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@reivilibre reivilibre marked this pull request as ready for review December 30, 2021 14:57
@reivilibre reivilibre requested a review from a team as a code owner December 30, 2021 14:57
matrix:
# Run the unit tests both against our oldest supported Python version
# and the newest stable.
python_version: [ "3.7", "3.x" ]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no idea what we currently support for this, but should we test 3.7 / 3.8 / 3.9 / 3.10?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No objection to doing so, but for some reason we decided to do oldest+newest for modules. Was it perhaps because of the burden of updating the CI files for each release?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(and current CI does Py 3.5 but I see no reason to support 3.5, 3.6 when Synapse itself isn't supported on those)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's fine! Wasn't sure if this was straight from the template or if you had modified it.

@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this was done by mistake?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The template emits it like that. I left it in because I thought having a zero diff is nice when the file is the same as what the template gives.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, weird...

@reivilibre reivilibre merged commit 6ac09b3 into main Dec 30, 2021
@reivilibre reivilibre deleted the rei/mt_ghas branch December 30, 2021 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants