qt module: allow has_tools to specify which tools to check #13632
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@nirbheek for review |
Open
|
ping |
dcbaker
reviewed
Sep 23, 2024
dcbaker
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2024
chubinou
force-pushed
the
qt-has_tools_selection
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f7d2ccf
to
a6ecc6b
Compare
This allows checking for tools that may not be available in older version of qt or avoiding requesting tools that may not be necessary for a given project Co-authored-by: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@centricular.com>
chubinou
force-pushed
the
qt-has_tools_selection
branch
from
a6ecc6b
to
f5f05db
Compare
dcbaker
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This allows checking for tools that may not be available in older version of qt or avoiding requesting tools that may not be necessary for a given project
this MR supersed #13524 as discussed here