Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enhance: refactor rust SDK #79

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

yah01
Copy link
Member

@yah01 yah01 commented Jan 10, 2024

/kind improvement

@sre-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: yah01

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

mergify bot commented Jan 10, 2024

@yah01 Please associate the related issue to the body of your Pull Request. (eg. “issue: #187”)

Signed-off-by: yah01 <yang.cen@zilliz.com>
@mergify mergify bot added the ci-passed label Jan 10, 2024
@yah01 yah01 changed the title refactor rust SDK enhance: refactor rust SDK Jan 10, 2024
@yah01
Copy link
Member Author

yah01 commented Jan 11, 2024

/kind improvement

@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot added the kind/improvement Changes related to something improve, likes ut and code refactor label Jan 11, 2024
@sunby
Copy link
Contributor

sunby commented Jan 11, 2024

/lgtm

@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot merged commit 20854d5 into milvus-io:main Jan 11, 2024
4 checks passed
@BadMask121
Copy link

Seems this refactor has not be published as a new version to crate

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved ci-passed dco-passed kind/improvement Changes related to something improve, likes ut and code refactor lgtm size/XXL
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants