Agenda: Development, June 11 2019

[bladedoyle]

Solicit suggestions for agenda items for the Development meeting to be held on Tuesday June 11 @ 15:00 UTC in Grin/Dev Gitter. Please comment to provide topics or suggestions.

Proposed agenda

1. Igno's Retrospective
2. Agenda review
3. Action point follow ups from previous meetings
   • @lehnberg v1.1.0 communication?
   • @ignopeverell documentation of git branching model (linked to in CONTRIBUTING)?
   • @quentinlesceller secp256k1-zkp on azure-pipelines?
   • @hashmap integration tests review?
   • @yeastplume security audit report findings issues filed?
4. Security review status
5. Grin v1.1.0
6. Grin v2.0.0
7. Review our branching model
8. POW: Putting phaseouts on hold
9. Other questions

[lehnberg]

@bladedoyle perhaps join tomorrow’s extra meeting (3PM UTC, same time as usual) in order to join in on the discussion?

[bladedoyle]

Yes, thank you @lehnberg.

[lehnberg]

Agenda updated.

[garyyu]

I strongly propose we define a dev branch, to be discussed in dev meeting:

https://gitter.im/grin_community/dev?at=5cf921e4bf4cbd167c3e7a01

How about define master as dev branch? to merge any reviewed PRs into master (i.e. dev branch).

• For example, if we need 1.1.1 release, we can branch from tag 1.1.0 for it;
• and after 1.1.1 release, if we still feel 1.1.2 release is needed, we can branch from tag 1.1.1 for it,
• and so on.

I think we need to start shifting expectations slightly around how long it should take for a PR or new concept to go from initial introduction into fully merged and targeting a particular release.
but can’t be too long, for the inspiring the developers.

We can make it longer before it go into a release, but i think we should NOT make it longer to merge/accept it (to dev branch for example).

[quentinlesceller]

@tromp wanted to discuss Grin Improvement Proposal 1: put later phase outs on hold and rephrase primary PoW commitment.

[lehnberg]

@quentinlesceller it's actually for next week's meeting, but it wouldn't hurt raising today either.

Agenda updated.

[quentinlesceller]

@lehnberg oups my bad :)

[tromp]

I thought that was a governance decision...

…

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 16:16 Quentin Le Sceller, ***@***.***> wrote: @tromp <https://github.com/tromp> wanted to discuss Grin Improvement Proposal 1: put later phase outs on hold and rephrase primary PoW commitment <https://www.grin-forum.org/t/grin-improvement-proposal-1-put-later-phase-outs-on-hold-and-rephrase-primary-pow-commitment/4653/36> . — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#143?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAR5BWZCXY7PRDRZX6LP4KTPZ6XTLA5CNFSM4HQFQR5KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODXNIUKY#issuecomment-500861483>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAR5BWYOAPUW7TM7Q5OPDSDPZ6XTLANCNFSM4HQFQR5A> .