-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is this library still functional/relevant/maintained as of 2021? #856
Comments
I would say the lack of maintenance is the only issue with this project. I'm fairly certain there's rules can be removed because it targets IE10 users, but is not needed for IE11 (Assuming IE support is important at all now a days for a library like this). At some classic Edge support should be given the same treatment as IE support. Windows versions with classic Edge are still being supported however, so it's not dead yet. |
There are a couple of alternatives that are actively maintained:
|
Which ones of those are more commonly used today? |
When I redid my site recently, I went with modern normalize because I was trying to use Tailwind (I hated it, but I'm sure there's a good use case for it if you're not regenerating the CSS all the time) |
Hello, Reboot is probably by far the most downloaded one as it it is part of Bootstrap 4 and 5 which is still hugely popular. I would probably use Sanitize.css or Modern-normalize in non-Bootstrap projects, use the built in Modern-normalize in Tailwind projects and use the already included Reboot when working on a modern Bootstrap projects (newer than 3). Here is a graph of the download statistics (Reboot's popularity is probably misleading, as their is no official standalone package of it): https://www.npmtrends.com/bootstrap-vs-modern-normalize-vs-sanitize.css-vs-normalize.css Cheers |
Awesome! Thanks for the reply! |
Maybe take a look at this:
|
As the title describes, my issue is in wondering if this library is still relevant/practical and functional as of 2021 or if there are any alternatives that would be more suited?
thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: