Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

crypto: replace gotos #23132

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

crypto: replace gotos #23132

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tniessen
Copy link
Member

These occurrences of goto are almost trivial and only end up calling End(). I personally don't think it makes the code less expressive, but I'd like to know if someone feels different.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@tniessen build started: https://ci.nodejs.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/node-test-pull-request-lite-pipeline/detail/node-test-pull-request-lite-pipeline/1045/pipeline

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. crypto Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem. labels Sep 27, 2018
@tniessen
Copy link
Member Author

tniessen commented Sep 27, 2018 •
edited
Loading

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/17475/
Resumed in https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/17478/

bnoordhuis
bnoordhuis approved these changes Sep 27, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If someone is feeling adventurous: I'd be curious to know if the custom handshake parser still wins out from openssl.

@tniessen
Copy link
Member Author

tniessen commented Sep 28, 2018 •
edited
Loading

This conflicts with #23014. I kind of like this variant better, but I can close it if others don't feel the same. I'd prefer to use OnScopeLeave only when necessary to cleanup resources, which isn't the case here in my opinion.

@gireeshpunathil
Copy link
Member

@tniessen - I was excited by the power of combining scoped variables. destructors and lambda, to tidy up the code and probably bring-in some functional programming elements to it when I developed #23014 . To me, other than the fact that the trapped object being destructed when leaving the scope (and leverage that destructor to run custom task on return), I don't see any connection with resource clean-up here.

If you think this is more readable and efficient, I am not objecting. thanks!

@tniessen
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased, old HEAD was 158c3eb063ba9983dfaca0067bf87455000f695e. @gireeshpunathil Thanks. I still liked your PR, I even approved it, I just forgot about it when I opened this one.

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/17532/

@addaleax addaleax added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Sep 30, 2018
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

addaleax commented Oct 1, 2018

Resume CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/17558/

@tniessen
Copy link
Member Author

tniessen commented Oct 1, 2018

Resume CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/17559/

@tniessen
Copy link
Member Author

tniessen commented Oct 1, 2018

Landed in 640172d, thanks for reviewing.

@tniessen tniessen closed this Oct 1, 2018
tniessen added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2018
@tniessen
crypto: replace gotos
640172d 
PR-URL: #23132
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@joyeecheung joyeecheung mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2018
Closed
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2018
@tniessen @targos
crypto: replace gotos
398c0e0 
PR-URL: #23132
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2018
Merged
@beevelop beevelop mentioned this pull request Oct 10, 2018
Closed
This was referenced Oct 10, 2018
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
@tniessen tniessen removed the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Jan 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis bnoordhuis approved these changes

@jasnell jasnell jasnell approved these changes

@thefourtheye thefourtheye thefourtheye approved these changes

@addaleax addaleax addaleax approved these changes

@lpinca lpinca lpinca approved these changes

@cjihrig cjihrig cjihrig approved these changes

@gireeshpunathil gireeshpunathil gireeshpunathil approved these changes

@lundibundi lundibundi lundibundi approved these changes

@mhdawson mhdawson mhdawson approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. crypto Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.