Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relax the range restriction on 'has soma location'. #703

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 29, 2023

Conversation

gouttegd
Copy link
Collaborator

The 'has soma location' (RO:0002100) should not have a range restriction to CARO's 'connected anatomical structure' (CARO:0000003), but rather to 'material anatomical entity' (CARO:0000006), which does not state anything about the "connectedness" of the entity that a neuron's soma may be located in.

closes #702

The 'has soma location' (RO:0002100) should not have a range restriction
to CARO's 'connected anatomical structure' (CARO:0000003), but rather to
'material anatomical entity' (CARO:0000006), which does not state
anything about the "connectedness" of the entity that a neuron's soma
may be located in.

closes #702
@gouttegd gouttegd self-assigned this Mar 29, 2023
@@ -1670,15 +1670,15 @@ SubObjectPropertyOf(obo:RO_0002092 obo:RO_0002091)
# Object Property: obo:RO_0002100 (has soma location)

AnnotationAssertion(obo:IAO_0000114 obo:RO_0002100 obo:IAO_0000125)
AnnotationAssertion(obo:IAO_0000115 obo:RO_0002100 "Relation between a neuron and an anatomical structure that its soma is part of."@en)
AnnotationAssertion(obo:IAO_0000115 obo:RO_0002100 "Relation between a neuron and an anatomical entity that its soma is part of."@en)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe specify 'material' anatomical entity here?

Make sure the text definition of 'has soma location' is aligned with the
range restriction and refers to a *material* anatomical entity.
@gouttegd gouttegd merged commit 7da344f into master Mar 29, 2023
@gouttegd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

That’s ~590 unsatisfiability issues gone away with a one-line change. 🎉

“Never in the history of ontology editing have so many unsats been fixed by so few changes.” — Winston Churchill (almost)

@gouttegd gouttegd deleted the relax-has-soma-location-restriction branch March 29, 2023 11:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Must 'has soma location' be range-restricted to 'connected anatomical structure'?
2 participants