Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix level alignment when levels have no measurements #212

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
15 changes: 8 additions & 7 deletions rmf_site_format/src/alignment.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ pub struct FiducialVariables<T: RefTrait> {
pub position: DVec2,
}

#[derive(Clone, Copy)]
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug)]
pub struct MeasurementVariables {
pub in_pixels: f64,
pub in_meters: f64,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -135,6 +135,12 @@ pub fn align_legacy_building(building: &BuildingMap) -> HashMap<String, Alignmen

initial_scale_numerator += m.in_meters / m.in_pixels;
}
// If no measurements are available, default to a standard 5cm per pixel
let initial_scale = if !level.measurements.is_empty() {
initial_scale_numerator / level.measurements.len() as f64
} else {
0.05
};
measurements.push(level_measurements);

let mut level_fiducials = Vec::new();
Expand All @@ -148,12 +154,7 @@ pub fn align_legacy_building(building: &BuildingMap) -> HashMap<String, Alignmen
}
fiducials.push(level_fiducials);

u.extend([
0.0,
0.0,
0.0,
initial_scale_numerator / level.measurements.len() as f64,
]);
u.extend([0.0, 0.0, 0.0, initial_scale]);
}

solve(&mut u, &fiducials, &measurements, false);
Expand Down
Loading