(coverage): Add a test case to cover that command is ignored when AcceptsCommand capability is not set

[srikanthccv]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 91.42% and project coverage change: -0.51% ⚠️

Comparison is base (efddaa2) 76.11% compared to head (c85262d) 75.61%.
Report is 22 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #195      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.11%   75.61%   -0.51%     
==========================================
  Files          24       24              
  Lines        1834     1874      +40     
==========================================
+ Hits         1396     1417      +21     
- Misses        326      340      +14     
- Partials      112      117       +5     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
client/types/callbacks.go	66.66% <ø> (ø)
server/httpconnection.go	33.33% <0.00%> (ø)
client/internal/mockserver.go	82.35% <85.71%> (+0.31%)	⬆️
server/serverimpl.go	58.92% <94.73%> (+0.37%)	⬆️
client/httpclient.go	95.16% <100.00%> (+0.42%)	⬆️
client/internal/clientcommon.go	79.80% <100.00%> (ø)
client/internal/httpsender.go	72.22% <100.00%> (+1.25%)	⬆️
client/internal/receivedprocessor.go	72.60% <100.00%> (-11.69%)	⬇️
server/callbacks.go	68.18% <100.00%> (-4.55%)	⬇️
server/wsconnection.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[tigrannajaryan]

@srikanthccv please clarify what the change is. Was the test incorrect or did you just add more cases to it?

[srikanthccv]

Ah, sorry, I added one more case. I was going through the coverage report and noticed that the command ignore part is not covered.