Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

spec: catalog operations optional. #40

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2019

Conversation

bsatlas
Copy link
Contributor

@bsatlas bsatlas commented Jan 4, 2019

This commit redefines the _catalog endpoint as an optional operation.

Background on the issue:
#22
https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/forum/#!topic/dev/rJ72OtZuhbc
opencontainers/tob#35
opencontainers/tob#46
opencontainers/tob#50

Signed-off-by: Atlas Kerr atlaskerr@gmail.com

This commit redefines the `_catalog` endpoint as an optional operation.

Background on the issue:
opencontainers#22
https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/forum/#!topic/dev/rJ72OtZuhbc
opencontainers/tob#35
opencontainers/tob#46
opencontainers/tob#50

Signed-off-by: Atlas Kerr <atlaskerr@gmail.com>
@vbatts
Copy link
Member

vbatts commented Jan 7, 2019

LGTM

Approved with PullApprove

@dmcgowan
Copy link
Member

dmcgowan commented Jan 7, 2019

LGTM

I think this is the right direction, but I would still like to consider having it completely removed from 1.0. If I were to read this as the response is not standardized Contents of the response are specific to the registry implementation, then how can tools even leverage it. We could reserve parts of the URL namespace for further specification in the future, but for the most part registries should be free to add endpoints to add registry level operations.

Approved with PullApprove

@dmcgowan dmcgowan merged commit fe98ce5 into opencontainers:master Jan 7, 2019
@bsatlas bsatlas deleted the catalog-optional branch January 8, 2019 09:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants