Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(test) Adding test coverage for encounter location handler #305

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 6, 2024

Conversation

gitcliff
Copy link
Contributor

@gitcliff gitcliff commented Jun 5, 2024

Requirements

  • This PR has a title that briefly describes the work done including the ticket number. If there is a ticket, make sure your PR title includes a conventional commit label. See existing PR titles for inspiration.
  • My work conforms to the OpenMRS 3.0 Styleguide and design documentation.
  • My work includes tests or is validated by existing tests.

Summary

Adding test coverage for the encounter location handler for handlingFieldSubmission, getting initial and previous values plus getDisplay value

Screenshots

Related Issue

Other

@pirupius pirupius changed the title (test):Adding test coverage for encounter location handler (test) Adding test coverage for encounter location handler Jun 5, 2024
Comment on lines 219 to 228
const field: FormField = {
label: 'Encounter Location',
type: 'encounterLocation',
required: false,
id: 'encounterLocation',
questionOptions: {
rendering: 'ui-select-extended',
},
validators: [],
};
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@samuelmale is this a pattern that will be maintained? The field definition seems to be repeated throughout the file but it's the same content. Or is it this way so each instance in the test is independent?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think for this scenario it should be possible to reuse a single field object across the suite. We can then add a cleanup or teardown callback that ensures that the side effects from the previous tests are cleaned up

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @pirupius @samuelmale ..
i have added a tear down

@pirupius pirupius merged commit 34d7cfb into openmrs:main Jun 6, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants