Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate local recovery with remote store seeding during migration #12922

Merged

Conversation

BhumikaSaini-Amazon
Copy link
Contributor

@BhumikaSaini-Amazon BhumikaSaini-Amazon commented Mar 26, 2024

Description

Integrates local recovery of shard with remote store seeding during migration of cluster to a remote backed cluster. This ensures that the data is uploaded to the remote store after performing a rolling restart as part of the docrep to remote store migration. Node restarts will also check if seeding is required and based on it will upload the data to remote.

Related Issues

#12246
#12718

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing.
    • All tests pass
  • New functionality has been documented.
    • New functionality has javadoc added
  • Failing checks are inspected and point to the corresponding known issue(s) (See: Troubleshooting Failing Builds)
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff
  • Commit changes are listed out in CHANGELOG.md file (See: Changelog) (will be covered under changelog entry for the high-level feature support)
  • Public documentation issue/PR created (not applicable)

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Compatibility status:

Checks if related components are compatible with change 5c328d5

Incompatible components

Skipped components

Compatible components

Compatible components: [https://github.com/opensearch-project/custom-codecs.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/neural-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/notifications.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/flow-framework.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/cross-cluster-replication.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/job-scheduler.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/asynchronous-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/security-analytics.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-oci-object-storage.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/geospatial.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/observability.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/reporting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/k-nn.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/anomaly-detection.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/common-utils.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/ml-commons.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/sql.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer-rca.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/index-management.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/alerting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/security.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer.git]

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 59cd374: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 1, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 86ed7cb: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for 44e7217: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@BhumikaSaini-Amazon BhumikaSaini-Amazon force-pushed the mixed-local-recovery-2 branch 2 times, most recently from f8339bc to 0afcdd2 Compare April 9, 2024 10:59
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2024

❌ Gradle check result for f8339bc: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2024

❕ Gradle check result for 0afcdd2: UNSTABLE

  • TEST FAILURES:
      1 org.opensearch.action.admin.cluster.node.tasks.ResourceAwareTasksTests.testTaskResourceTrackingDuringTaskCancellation

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 9, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 52.17391% with 11 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71.34%. Comparing base (b15cb0c) to head (d28f6da).
Report is 218 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
...java/org/opensearch/index/shard/StoreRecovery.java 0.00% 6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...rg/opensearch/index/translog/RemoteFsTranslog.java 66.66% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...c/main/java/org/opensearch/index/IndexService.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...org/opensearch/index/seqno/ReplicationTracker.java 75.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #12922      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     71.42%   71.34%   -0.08%     
- Complexity    59978    60653     +675     
============================================
  Files          4985     5044      +59     
  Lines        282275   285711    +3436     
  Branches      40946    41373     +427     
============================================
+ Hits         201603   203833    +2230     
- Misses        63999    65022    +1023     
- Partials      16673    16856     +183     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Bhumika Saini added 11 commits April 25, 2024 10:21
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Saini <sabhumik@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Saini <sabhumik@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Saini <sabhumik@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Saini <sabhumik@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Saini <sabhumik@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Saini <sabhumik@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Saini <sabhumik@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Saini <sabhumik@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Saini <sabhumik@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Saini <sabhumik@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Saini <sabhumik@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Bhumika Saini <sabhumik@amazon.com>
Copy link
Contributor

❕ Gradle check result for 9be0001: UNSTABLE

  • TEST FAILURES:
      1 org.opensearch.cluster.MinimumClusterManagerNodesIT.testThreeNodesNoClusterManagerBlock

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

@BhumikaSaini-Amazon
Copy link
Contributor Author

org.opensearch.cluster.MinimumClusterManagerNodesIT.testThreeNodesNoClusterManagerBlock => reported flaky in #10006

Copy link
Contributor

❕ Gradle check result for d28f6da: UNSTABLE

  • TEST FAILURES:
      2 org.opensearch.cluster.coordination.AwarenessAttributeDecommissionIT.testConcurrentDecommissionAction

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

@gbbafna gbbafna merged commit a8008e2 into opensearch-project:main Apr 25, 2024
28 of 29 checks passed
@gbbafna gbbafna added the backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch label Apr 25, 2024
@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The backport to 2.x failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Navigate to the root of your repository
cd $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x 2.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
pushd ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport/backport-12922-to-2.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 a8008e2f37ec7dca061fcb7b5f84c944dd4f1108
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport/backport-12922-to-2.x
# Go back to the original working tree
popd
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove ../.worktrees/OpenSearch/backport-2.x

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is 2.x and the compare/head branch is backport/backport-12922-to-2.x.

BhumikaSaini-Amazon pushed a commit to BhumikaSaini-Amazon/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2024
@ashking94 ashking94 added backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch and removed backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch backport-failed labels Apr 28, 2024
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2024
…12922)

Signed-off-by: Bhumika Saini <sabhumik@amazon.com>
(cherry picked from commit a8008e2)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
sachinpkale pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2024
…12922) (#13428)

(cherry picked from commit a8008e2)

Signed-off-by: Bhumika Saini <sabhumik@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch skip-changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants